advertisement
Cerelac and Nido, two of Nestle’s best-selling baby-food brands in low-income and middle-income countries, have high levels of added sugar – in the form of sucrose and honey.
In contrast, these products are sugar free in Switzerland, the brand’s home country, and in other European nations.
This is what a Swiss organisation – Public Eye – found when it investigated the brand along with International Baby Food Action Network (IBFAN).
What does this mean? Why does this matter? FIT breaks it down for you.
According to Public Eye and IBFAN, in low-income and middle-income countries:
Cerelac infant cereals – for infants who are six months and older – contain added sugar which is “nearly four grams per serving on average” or “equal to roughly a sugar cube.” In the Philippines, a product had 7.3 grams per serving of added sugar – the highest anywhere.
Nido powdered-milk products – for children between the ages of 1-3 years – contain added sugar which is “almost two grams per serving on average.” In Panama, a product had 5.3 grams per serving of added sugar – the highest anywhere.
Nestle is one of the world’s largest consumer goods companies, controlling over 20 percent of the baby-food market.
It’s valued at around USD 70 billion and earned over USD 2.5 billion in 2022 from Cerelac and Nido alone.
Brazil and India reportedly account for 40 percent of Nestle’s baby-products sales among low-income and middle-income countries. In India, Cerelac received sales over USD 250 million in 2022.
The WHO had stated that in 2022, one in eight people in the world were clinically obese. Over a billion people are obese, globally.
According to a landmark Lancet study published earlier this year, 70 million adults live with obesity in India – 44 million women and 26 million men.
Dr Arun Gupta, a paediatrician and a former member of the Prime Minister’s Council on India’s Nutrition Challenges, tells FIT,
Dr Gupta adds, “These ultra-processed foods are inherently unhealthy because they contain industrial chemicals and saturated fats. Also, sugar products are addictive and early exposure causes an inclination towards them.”
If added sugars are so harmful to health, why do brands even use them in products in the first place? Well, for starters, sugar is relatively cheaper and helps bulk the product.
However, most western nations have limitations for added sugars and sweetening agents for children below a certain age. For instance,
WHO in Europe doesn’t allow added sugars in products for children under the age of three years.
The UK doesn’t allow food with added sugars for children under four years of age.
The US advises against children under two years of age consuming added sugars.
If there are international regulations, why do brands like Nestle not consider them while manufacturing products for all their markets?
Dr Gupta says,
But, wait a minute, what do India’s laws on infant food products say?
According to The Infant Milk Substitutes, Feeding Bottles and Infant Foods (Regulation of Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 1992, no person is allowed to advertise, promote, and give “an impression that feeding of infant milk substitutes and infant foods are equivalent to, or better than, mother’s milk.”
However, the Indian Academy of Pediatrics and the WHO have both recommended on multiple occasions that children under the age of two years not be given any foods that have added sugar.
Also noteworthy is the fact that this is not the first time that Nestle has been pulled up for such violations.
In 2018, the Changing Markets Foundation had stated in a report that Nestle’s infant milk formulas, sold in South Africa, had sucrose in them, while the product sold in other countries didn’t.
Similarly, Nestle’s baby milk powder sold in Hong Kong was free of vanilla flavourings, but contained the element in products sold in other places.
Dr Gupta adds, “Last year, an internal report of Nestle got leaked which clearly stated that over 60 percent of its food products were unhealthy and did not meet the health standards.”
Responding to the allegations, a Nestle spokesperson told The Guardian, “We believe in the nutritional quality of our products for early childhood and prioritise using high-quality ingredients adapted to the growth and development of children.”
Nestle India, in a statement released on 18 April, said, "Compliance is an essential characteristic of Nestlé India and we will never compromise on that. We also ensure that our products manufactured in India are in full and strict compliance with CODEX standards (a commission established by WHO and FAO) and local specifications (as required) pertaining to the requirements all nutrients including added sugars. Reduction of added sugars is a priority for Nestlé India."
On a global level, in the past 10 years, Nestle claims to have reduced added sugars by 11 percent.
The investigating agencies, however, alleged that Nestle had “aggressively advertised these products as essential to children’s healthy development” and misled consumers in Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
Public Eye, in a press release, said, “A petition demands that Nestle put an end to this unjustifiable and harmful double standard, which contributes to the explosive rise of obesity and leads children to develop a life-long preference for sugary products.”
Dr Gupta agrees. He tells FIT, “As of now, the law is not implemented seriously and effectively in developing countries. What we need is an annual report of these brands and banning all products that do not meet the standards for healthy food for infants.”
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)
Published: undefined