President Donald Trump on Sunday slapped new travel restrictions on citizens from North Korea, Venezuela and Chad, expanding the list of countries covered by his original travel bans that have been derided by critics and challenged in court.
Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen and Somalia were left on the list of affected countries in a new proclamation issued by the President. Restrictions on citizens from Sudan were lifted.
“Making America Safe is my number one priority. We will not admit those into our country we cannot safely vet,” Trump said in a tweet shortly after the proclamation was released.
Iraqi citizens will not be subject to travel prohibitions but will face enhanced scrutiny or vetting.
The current ban, enacted in March, was set to expire on Sunday evening.
The new restrictions, slated to take effect on 18 October, resulted from a review after Trump's original travel bans sparked international outrage and legal challenges.
The addition of North Korea and Venezuela broadens the restrictions from the original, mostly Muslim-majority list.
"North Korea does not cooperate with the United States government in any respect and fails to satisfy all information-sharing requirements," the proclamation said.
An administration official, briefing reporters on a conference call, acknowledged that the number of North Koreans now traveling to the United States was very low.
Earlier on Sunday, Trump told reporters about the ban: "The tougher, the better."
Rather than a total ban on entry to the United States, the proposed restrictions would differ by nation, based on cooperation with American security mandates, the threat the United States believes each country presents and other variables, officials said.
After the 15 September bombing attack on a London train, Trump wrote on Twitter that the new ban “should be far larger, tougher and more specific – but stupidly, that would not be politically correct.”
The expiring ban blocked entry into the United States by people from the six countries for 90 days, and locked out most aspiring refugees for 120 days to give Trump’s administration time to conduct a worldwide review of the US vetting procedures for foreign visitors.
Critics have accused the Republican President of discriminating against Muslims in violation of the constitutional guarantees of religious liberty and equal protection under the law, breaking existing US immigration law and stoking religious hatred.
Some federal courts blocked the ban, but the US Supreme Court allowed it to take effect in June with some restrictions.
The Supreme Court will hear arguments on 10 October on whether the current ban discriminates against Muslims in violation of the US Constitution, as lower courts previously ruled.
(This article has been shortened for length.)
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)