After Losing Triple Talaq Case, Kapil Sibal Welcomes SC Verdict

Senior lawyer Kapil Sibal represented the Muslim Personal Law Board in the Supreme Court in triple talaq case.

Senior lawyer Kapil Sibal, who represented the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) in the Supreme Court, on Tuesday said the apex court judgment banning triple talaq is welcome, as it also lays down by majority that Muslim personal laws cannot be interfered with.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday, by a split verdict, banned the practice of divorce in one sitting.

Sibal appeared in the court on behalf of the AIMPLB, while senior advocate MR Shamshad assisted him in the case.

“We welcome the judgment. The divorce being administered by the husband by saying talaq, talaq, talaq has been banned,” said Sibal.

Also Read: Triple Talaq: 5 Judges, 3 Views, 1 Order, But Why No Clarity?

But that decision where triple talaq is administered in one sitting is different from the decision in the law, which by majority says that personal laws can’t be tested on the anvil of Part III of the Constitution. They cannot be tested on grounds of violation of Article 14 or 25. Which means that decision in law by majority is protecting personal laws which cannot be set aside by being in contravention of Part III of the Constitution

Kapil Sibal

Sibal stressed that the apex court had only banned the administering of triple talaq in one sitting, and it did not interfere with the other two forms of triple talaq which are Talaq-e-Ahsan and Talaq-e-Hasan.

Also Read: Meet the Women Who Battled Tradition, Triple Talaq & Patriarchy

Shamshad explained that the court had two issues to examine – one was that of instant divorce, and the other was whether a community's personal laws can be interfered with.

The larger aspect was whether personal laws can be challenged in a court of law. The court is clear it cannot be done. The majority of three judges said that court cannot interfere in personal laws on the ground of judicial morality.

MR Shamshad

“As for triple talaq in one sitting, the court said it is wrong because we ourselves are saying it is wrong. But in the larger aspect the court upheld our view, so we welcome the judgment,” he said.

Also Read: How Our ‘Extremist’ Neighbour Pakistan Banned Triple Talaq in 1961

(#TalkingStalking: Have you ever been stalked? Share your experience with The Quint and inspire others to shatter the silence surrounding stalking. Send your stories to [e-mail] or WhatsApp @ [phone]. )