Court Summons Reporter, ‘The Wire’ Editors Over Jay Shah Story

The summons to the reporter and Founding Editors are under Sections 500 and 114 of the IPC.

The Ahmedabad Metropolitan Court on 24 October issued summons to all the accused in a criminal defamation case filed by Jay Shah, son of BJP President Amit Shah, against news website The Wire for publishing a story saying that the turnover of Jay Shah's company jumped 16,000 times after the Modi government took office.

The summons to the reporter Rohini Singh and Founding Editors Siddharth Varadarajan and MK Venu are under Sections 500 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Section 202 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

According to SV Raju, advocate for Jay Shah, they contended in the court that there was a prima facie case of defamation and the article was published with the intent and knowledge to defame.

Also Read: What Can The Wire Do to Challenge Jay Shah’s Ex Parte Injunction?

There was an ulterior motive in publishing the article and the timing was deliberate to make it an issue for the Gujarat elections.

SV Raju

He told the court that Jay Shah's reply was not considered while publishing the article.

The Wire published an article on 8 October written by Singh which claimed that the revenues of Shah's company had risen 16,000 times from Rs 50,000 to Rs 80 crore within a year after Narendra Modi became the Prime Minister in 2014.

He then filed a defamation case in the metropolitan court on 9 October against Rohini Singh, the author of the story, editors, and owner of the online media outlet The Wire, Federation for Independent Journalists (FIJ).

Also Read: Those Accusing Jay Shah of Wrongdoing Should Go to Court: RSS

Jay Shah and his lawyers, who were not present at the last hearing on 11 October, attended the court on Tuesday to argue the case. Two witnesses, Jaimin Shah and Rajiv Shah, were also there.

After Jay Shah verified his complaint, Jaimin Shah submitted that he had received a weblink of the article from his friend and after going through it he felt it could harm the reputation of Jay Shah.

Rajiv Shah said he received the article link on his mobile phone and he found it defamatory for Jay Shah, whom he described as a "simple" person and a "man of repute" in the society.

The next hearing has been posted for 13 November.

(Breathe In, Breathe Out: Are you finding it tough to breathe polluted air? Join hands with FIT to find #PollutionKaSolution. Send in your suggestions to [e-mail] or WhatsApp @ [phone])