A bench headed by Chief Justice NV Ramana on Wednesday, 6 April, said that it hopes it does not have to hear this case again, while noting that Amazon and Future Retail Limited (FRL) will move the arbitration tribunal to resume arbitration proceedings.
The top court added that the tribunal will consider FRL's application on priority for termination of arbitration proceedings, and pass orders.
Concluding the hearing in the matter, the Chief Justice said: "I hope, I don't get to hear this case again."
Senior advocate Gopal Subramanium, representing Amazon, said, "We look forward to appearing before you."
The Chief Justice replied, "No, no! Some other case."
The top court was considering an application by Amazon seeking a direction to restrain FRL from alienating its assets. Amazon has alleged that FRL surrendered its stores to Reliance.
Senior advocate KV Viswanathan, representing FRL, submitted before the court that the tribunal should decide on his client's application seeking termination of arbitration proceedings on priority.
Amazon versus Future Retail
FRL has sought termination of arbitration proceedings citing a Competition Commission of India (CCI) order. In December last year, the CCI had imposed a penalty of Rs 202 crore on Amazon and suspended its approval for the deal with Future Coupons, a promoter firm of the group's public listed company Future Retail Ltd, seeking more information.
Subramanium submitted that the single judge of the Delhi High Court has taken over the enforcement application. "Thus, we don't have to bother you and the other side also cooperated with us," he submitted before the bench, also comprising Krishna Murari and Hima Kohli.
The bench noted that the parties agree that proceedings are underway before the single judge of the high court and thus these applications are also sent to the single judge.
Disposing of the plea, the bench said parties will approach the tribunal to resume arbitration proceedings and the tribunal will consider the termination application by FRL as under Section 32(2)(C), and pass orders.
Last week, senior advocate Harish Salve, representing FRL, told the Supreme Court that nobody wants to do business with it today as Section 7 of the IBC may come any day, and the company owes landlords thousands of crores in rentals, as Amazon could not get Future Retail, it destroyed the company. He added that Reliance entered into agreement with the landlords (of its shops), and Future Retail owes Rs 3,000 crore in rentals.
Subramanium had vehemently objected to the sudden handover of Future Retail assets. Citing a prayer in Amazon's application, Subramanium opposed the alienation of Future Retail assets and added "Can't be a magical switch... Future Retail shops should continue to remain with it; operated by FRL until matter is resolved by an arbitral tribunal".
Amazon, in an application, had raised the issue of Future Retail's shops and assets being taken over by Reliance, besides resumption of arbitration over FRL's merger deal with Reliance Retail.
Last month, Amazon alleged that 80 percent of FRL shops have been surrendered to Reliance. Future Retail said no asset has been transferred.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)