Did the country’s leading telecom company Airtel replace a Muslim customer service representative named Shoaib with a non-Muslim employee Gaganjot on the demand of its customer? The company faced a storm on social media after screenshots of its response to its customer who tweets with the user name @pooja303singh went viral on 18 June.
This was enough for numerous people to condemn the telecom company, including former J&K Chief Minister Omar Abdullah. Abdullah called out Airtel and said that he would port his number for the company’s capitulation to a customer’s bigotry.
So to recap, here is the timeline we can see from the screenshots that were running on Twitter.
- 12:09 PM – 18 Jun 2018 : Pooja tweets to @airtelindia complaining about a customer service representative.
- 12:18 PM – 18 Jun 2018 : Pooja receives a reply from @Airtel_Presence assuring her that she would be tended to shortly after gathering more information. The name of this representative is Shoaib.
- 2:59 PM – 18 Jun 2018 : Pooja responds with an explosive tweet – “Dear Shohaib, as you’re a Muslim and I have no faith in your working ethics because Kuran may have different version for customer service, thus requesting you to assign a Hindu representative for my request. Thanks.”
- 3:25 PM – 18 Jun 2018 : Pooja receives a reply from another customer representative Gaganjot who responds, “Hi Pooja! As discussed, please let me know what days & time frames work best for you so we can talk. Further, please share an alternate number so that I can assist you further with this. Thank you, Gaganjot.”
This flow of conversation appeared to show that Airtel gave in to a customer’s discriminatory demand and replaced Shoaib with Gaganjot.
But on a closer look at the entire timeline, BOOM found an important tweet buried under the sea of tweets that could have saved Airtel from the PR crisis that engulfed the company over the next two days.
Gaganjot had replied at 12:34 pm, nearly two-and-half hours prior to Pooja’s controversial tweet at 2:59 pm. This fact was missed by all those who were sharing the Twitter thread, attacking Airtel for its complicity in changing its representative upon Pooja’s demand.
It is a mystery how Airtel missed pointing out this tweet in its press release that could have silenced everyone and shown that Gaganjot had already been in contact with Pooja at the time of her discriminatory tweet.
Sources at Airtel also point out that Gaganjot and Pooja were already in touch on direct messages (three times between 1 pm and 2 pm) after this 12:34 pm tweet, before Pooja tweeted at 2:59 pm with her bigoted demand. Hence, it is unclear why Pooja chose to respond to Shoaib who was not servicing her complaint after his initial response at 12:09 pm.
Within Airtel, the storm after this incident has also forced the organisation to relook at its own response time when a communally sensitive demand is made by one of its customers on a public platform. The company was heavily criticised for taking over 5 hours to tweet an appropriate response calling out Pooja for her bigoted tweet.
We have not been able to reach out to Pooja Singh for her version of the conversation with Airtel.
BOOM sent Airtel a formal email seeking detailed replies to several queries on their internal processes and the missing tweet of Gaganjot. We are yet to receive a reply from the company and will update the story if we receive it later.
(Published in an arrangement with BOOM.)
(Jency Jacob is the Managing Editor of BOOM and has 17 years experience of working with some of the top brands across television and print networks in the country. At BOOM, Jency apart from providing editorial leadership to the team also writes fact checks and opinion pieces on claims made by those in power and social media influencers. Jency is also the co-host of the weekly fact check show Fact Vs Fiction. This article has been republished in an arrangement with BOOM.)
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)