advertisement
Video Editor: Vivek Gupta
If there’s one underpinning principle that guides parliaments across the world, it is informed debate and dissent within the confines of reason. It is here that matters of national and international consequences are deliberated and solutions to pressing issues are arrived at.
But India’s ruling dispensation sought to turn this very principle on its head on 13 March 2018, when over 99 funding demands from government departments, 218 amendments, the Finance Bill 2018 and the Appropriation Bill were passed in a matter of 30 minutes without any debate in the Lok Sabha.
The ‘guillotine’ however, can only be used on the last day of the period prescribed for discussions on the demands for grants. The process brings all outstanding funding demands to be put under vote for the explicit purpose of getting the passed at one go. Once the process is used, all pending demands must be voted on without any discussion.
To be fair to Mahajan, the house witnessed repeated disruptions over the PNB scam, allotment of Special Category status to Andhra Pradesh. But approving decisions on where and how the government spends without discussion and especially through voice vote, doesn’t bode well for a parliment.
Among the demands passed were
The Finance Bill, being a money bill can only originate in the Lok Sabha, following which, it is goes to the Rajya Sabha for approval. But the Rajya Sabha, also known as the upper house, has little power when it comes to suggesting amendments to a money bill, which may or may not be approved by the Lok Sabha.
True that the opposition hasn’t helped the situation any better. But passing bills with significant monetary impact without discussing them on the table is undemocratic.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)