advertisement
If the way the stock price of Match Group Inc, Tinder’s parent company, plunged the moment Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said the social networking giant is introducing a dating feature, one would think it was as if Facebook just dumped Tinder.
But if you think about it, in a way it has.
Listen to the story instead:
Tinder is largely reliant on Facebook for profile information of its users, and most importantly, to sign up on the app. It has only recently started taking direct sign ups using mobile phone numbers alone.
But is Facebook really such a threat to Tinder? Given the sheer size of it, yes. Facebook has 200 million ‘single’ registered users. In comparison, Tinder’s total user base is only 95 million.
Facebook could have just bought Tinder if it wanted a Dating app right? So why hasn’t that emerged as a likely deal? After all, Facebook is famous for gobbling up companies in multi-billion dollar deals.
Shouldn’t Tinder have been a pretty obvious choice if Facebook was looking to start Dating (not literally)? Tinder’s valuation was pegged at $3 billion in 2017, when its parent company Match Group converted options.
Tinder’s popularity lies in its simplicity. It does not ask a user to fill out long questionnaires to build a profile. Instead, it relies on Facebook data or just a couple of simple steps to create one.
Does Tinder really need to worry about Facebook getting into the dating game? Yes, it does. Tinder is rattled for sure, going by responses from its senior management to Facebook’s announcement.
Joey Levin, the CEO of IAC, the company that has a majority holding in Match Group, was pretty caustic.
Mandy Ginsberg, CEO of Match Group was a little more accommodating, saying the company wasn’t worried with Facebook’s entry to the space, but questioned the timing.
Tinder should be worried as it could lose a majority of its user base if Facebook blocks access to its users. A few weeks ago, Tinder users were a worried lot, when Facebook updated its privacy settings – temporarily taking down Tinder for some.
However, users of Tinder say they will not really get off the app even if Facebook gets into the game. But that does not mean they will not shy away from what Facebook has to offer. One user sees Facebook’s Dating app as a more organised set up, meant for more serious relationships, while Tinder is for more casual relationships. Both can coexist.
Tinder, meanwhile, has seen its revenues soar with an increasing base of paid subscribers. Match Group’s total revenue (including Tinder, OkCupid and Match.com) rose 28.5 percent in the December quarter to $379 million according to Reuters. This may not be a patch on Facebook, but at the rate it’s adding subscribers it is bound to be profitable.
Given that growth rate, Tinder can afford to stay single. Unless, of course, it finds a match elsewhere.
Hey Google, care for a date?
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)