advertisement
Facebook will overhaul its ad-targeting systems to prevent discrimination in housing, credit and employment ads as part of a legal settlement.
The changes to Facebook's advertising methods – which generate most of the company's enormous profits – are unprecedented. The social network says it will no longer allow housing, employment or credit ads that target people by age, gender or zip code. Facebook will also limit other targeting options so these ads don't exclude people on the basis of race, ethnicity and other legally protected categories in the US, including national origin and sexual orientation.
Facebook and the plaintiffs – a group including the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Fair Housing Alliance and others – called the settlement that took 18 months to hammer out, "historic." The company still faces an administrative complaint filed by US Department of Housing and Urban Development in August over the housing ads issue.
What's not yet clear is how well the safeguards will work. Facebook has been working to address a slew of social consequences related to its platform, with varying degrees of success.
Earlier in March, CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced a new ‘privacy-focused vision’ for the company to focus on messaging instead of more public sharing – but he stayed mum on overhauling Facebook's privacy practices in its core business.
Galen Sherwin, senior staff attorney at the ACLU and the group's lead attorney on its suit, praised the settlement as "sweeping" and said she expects it to have ripple effects through the tech industry.
Facebook agreed to let the groups test its ad systems to ensure they don't enable discrimination.
Discrimination hasn't been Facebook's only problem with ad targeting. It's taken fire for allowing advertisers to target groups of people identified as "Jew-haters" and Nazi sympathisers. It's also still dealing with fallout from the 2016 election, when, among other things, Facebook allowed fake Russian accounts to buy ads targeting US users to stir up political divisions.
One of the complaints said that Facebook violated the Fair Housing Act because its targeting systems allow advertisers to exclude certain audiences, such as families with children or disabled people, from seeing housing ads. Others alleged job discrimination, with ads being shown to men but not women in traditionally male-dominated fields, or only to younger users.
Facebook will also limit the targeting categories available for such ads. For example, such advertisers wouldn't be able to exclude groups such as "soccer moms" or people who joined a group on black hair care.
Endlessly customisable ad targeting is Facebook's bread and butter. The ads users see can be tailored down to the most granular details – not just where people live and what websites they visited recently, but whether they've gotten engaged in the past six months or share characteristics with people who have recently bought a BMW, even if they have never expressed interest in doing so themselves. It's how the company made $56 billion in revenue last year.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)