advertisement
Cricket statistics can often be ambiguous.
Case in point – first delivery of the 17th over, of Saturday’s ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2024 final match between India and South Africa.
What does the scoreboard say?
Heinrich Klaasen – caught Rishabh Pant – bowled Hardik Pandya.
Perhaps, the scoreboard would have mentioned:
Heinrich Klaasen – caught Rishabh Pant – bowled Hardik Pandya – assisted by Jasprit Bumrah.
Before 16.1, we had 1.3.
The third delivery of the second over of South Africa’s innings. Bumrah pitches it between middle and off, extracts zip off the surface, the ball angles away from Reeza Hendricks, and hits the top of off-stump.
If this dismissal evoked déjà vu, you’re not alone. For, it was a sight we had seen before.
Barring Bumrah’s early breakthroughs, what unites these three matches?
The outcome. India ended up on the losing side, every time.
Would it be the same on Saturday?
Would history repeat itself on Saturday?
It so nearly did. The 15th over of the 177-run chase saw Heinrich Klaasen ripping into Axar Patel, hitting a couple of sixes and as many maximums, and subsequently, accumulating 24 runs in that over. The equation, which was 54 of 36 deliveries at a required run rate of 9 not very long ago, was now 30 of 30. Run-a-ball.
Rohit Sharma turned to Bumrah, more in hope than belief. Not ‘Win us the match as you always do,’ but ‘Please, do something to bail us out.’
Bumrah responded with 1, 2, Dot, Dot, 1, Dot. Just four runs from the 16th over, after the previous two had yielded 38.
And now, we arrive at 16.1.
Pandya bowled wide, Klaasen swung wildly, edged faintly, and Pant caught him behind. What the scorecard won’t show is: ‘assisted by Jasprit Bumrah.’
Bumrah was competing in his fifth World Cup – across the two formats. Let us revisit his performances in the previous four instalments.
2016 T20 World Cup – A wicket in every match, barring one.
2019 ODI World Cup – India’s leading wicket-taker, with 18 scalps. With an economy rate of 4.41 runs per over, he was also the most economical bowler among those with 10 or more wickets.
2021 T20 World Cup – India’s leading wicket-taker again, with 7 scalps. His economy rate of 5.08 runs per over was the lowest among bowlers who took more than five wickets.
2023 ODI World Cup – 20 wickets, second-highest for India. But, his economy rate of 4.06 runs per over was second only to Ravichandran Ashwin, who played a solitary match.
For all that he had done for the nation, he had never been a world champion – lest we forget, for no fault of his own.
An assortment of amazing achievements, yes, but still not enough to compensate for the major blemish – he has never been a world champion.
When Bumrah was given the responsibility to bowl the 16th over, he, his teammates, coaches, fans, and the nation at large, knew that he was not the postscript anymore. For that fleeting-yet-pivotal, ephemeral-yet-climacteric moment, Bumrah was the main event. The show-stopper. 4 runs in that over, followed by 2 runs and a wicket in his last over. 6 runs from 12 deliveries – at the death, in a World Cup final.
And when curtains were eventually drawn on the match, the chronicles which triggered the most clamour pertained to the T20I retirement of the two luminaries – Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma. Rightfully so, for what they had achieved. Across formats, it was the second World Cup triumph for the pair.
Little could he care. All he wanted was for his team to win.
What should not remain a postscript anymore, is that Bumrah is now a world champion. There is a debate about modern-day pace greats? That, Bumrah lacks one particular feat, should not be a case in point anymore.
Bumrah, one would assume, might be too modest, too unostentatious, too reticent to listen to American rapper Kendrick Lamar.
Had he did, following last night’s heroics, he might have sung:
“F*** the big three, it’s just big me.”
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)