advertisement
(This story was first published on 8 Jan, 2019 and has been reposted from The Quint's archives to mark Cheteshwar Pujara’s 31st birthday)
The Oxford Dictionary defines collateral as “something pledged as security for repayment of a loan, to be forfeited in the event of a default”.
Let’s go through Cheteshwar Pujara’s exclusions from the Indian Test team since establishing himself as a ‘regular’ in the squad:
For a man who now boasts 18 Test hundreds, Pujara, until very recently, has been India’s favourite whipping tool when it comes to selection; India’s ‘collateral’, if you may.
The same Oxford Dictionary defines colossus as “a person or thing of enormous size, importance, or ability”.
Pujara’s omissions from Indian Test XIs weren’t always an injustice of nature – there were visible chinks in the armour, in particular in the ‘tough’ parts of the world.
While he amassed the runs without fail when at home, or in Sri Lanka (three 100s in six innings, average 90.80), there were legitimate grounds to believe Pujara was being found out in the tougher climes of Australia, England, New Zealand and South Africa.
After impressing in South Africa towards the end of 2013, with an average of 70 from two Tests, the number three fared miserably through the rest of India’s previous touring cycle.
Things didn’t appear to be changing when the ongoing touring cycle kicked off in South Africa a year ago either. A round 50 in the first innings at Johannesburg formed half of Pujara’s runs through the three-Test series, one where he averaged 16.66 – his lowest in any series of more than two matches through his career.
The travelling caravan moved to England, and after sitting out at Edgbaston, Pujara returned with scores of 1 and 17 at Lord’s. But that was part of an innings drubbing where India managed a match total of 237 runs.
Then came the Nottingham Test, starting 18 August 2018. It’s a date, or a Test, marking a renaissance.
Pujara’s scores away from home ever since?
Virat Kohli may be the golden standard of batting across the globe, but in the greatest test of his world number one ranked unit, the efforts of the man preceding him in the batting order may have succeeded even Kohli’s genius. If India go on to complete the unprecedented task – a Test series win in Australia – Pujara will be the man who made the series India’s.
What one Rahul Dravid was to Headingley 2002, Adelaide 2003, Rawalpindi 2004 and Kingston 2006, Pujara has been to Jo’burg, Nottingham, Adelaide, Melbourne and now (possibly) Sydney in 2018/19.
Pujara’s iconic predecessor, a man accustomed to living in the shadows himself, was all praise for his efforts – and resolve amid trying times.
Another former great of Indian batting, Sunil Gavaskar – the first Indian to hit three hundreds in a Test series Down Under, a feat now matched by Pujara – took an even stronger stance after the opening day’s play at Sydney.
Think about it. Pujara’s ‘relevance’ to Indian cricket is limited to one format, known for not attracting too many in the crash-and-bang age of the game.
In May this year, when India embark upon their bid to become world champions again, he will lie temporarily-forgotten. Even before that, come the Indian summer, Pujara’s appearances will be restricted to being trolled on Twitter in the wake of the IPL season – which he won’t be part of for the fifth year running.
Given how runs made on home soil rarely go towards the annals of Indian batsmanship, his next ‘real’ Test may not come for another two years.
But over one Australian summer, Pujara – he who could so easily have veered towards insecurity – has secured his spot, and his status.
Over one Australian summer, Cheteshwar Pujara has gone from collateral, to colossus.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)