advertisement
The BCCI top brass is not overtly perturbed by Law Commission's recommendation of bringing the richest sporting body of the country under the Right To Information (RTI) ambit.
The Law Commission in its report noted that the BCCI falls under the definition of a public authority, which has received substantial financing from governments.
It also said non-consideration of the role played by the BCCI as "monopolistic" in regulation of the game of cricket has resulted in the board "flying under the radar of public scrutiny, encouraged an environment of opacity and non-accountability".
The report, submitted to the Law Ministry on 19 April, states that the BCCI ought to be classified as 'state' as per Article 12 of the Constitution.
"An analysis of the functioning of the BCCI also shows that the government does exercise control over its activities and functioning," said the report.
A senior BCCI official tried to put things in perspective. "Right now, there is no immediate cause of concern for the board. Everyone knows that the BCCI does not take any government grant. Today, they want us to come under RTI ambit and tomorrow we would be forced to come under Indian Olympic Association (IOA) banner like other National Sports Federations (NSFs). The NSFs are dependant on government funding and we are not. The implications are far-reaching," the veteran official said.
"And please don't forget, politicians of eminence have been associated in various capacities in the BCCI as office-bearers. And some of them are still lawmakers as Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha MPs. It will be interesting to see what is their take on Law Commission's recommendation," he added.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)
Published: undefined