advertisement
It is very difficult for someone like me to talk about the moral significance of the message of the Prophet of Islam, Muhammad, in today’s world, for at least two reasons.
The global public discourse is already divided into two camps: the ‘protectors of Islam’ and the ‘champions of freedom of expression/speech’. The violent events in Europe followed by an equally powerful global political reaction to them have virtually forced us to take a clear, unambiguous, and blunt position on these events, as if the figure of the Prophet can only be understood through these two conflicting interpretations.
Secondly, there is a personal dilemma. I find a serious tussle between two attributes of my identity, which make it even more difficult to get rid of the established imaginations of Islam and Prophet Muhammad. As a professional researcher, I am encouraged to have a critical perspective on every historical personality including the Prophet, and every religious scripture including the Quran. On the other hand, as a born Muslim, it is expected of me to recognise Prophet Muhammad as the ‘messenger of Allah’, the ‘last Prophet’ – and the Quran as the ‘ultimate source of knowledge’.
I would like to mention two such constitutive elements, which are relevant for us.
The first is his strong adherence to freedom of speech and expression. Despite declaring himself a Prophet of Allah, Muhammad always reminds us that he is a human being. This makes his claims highly exceptional. In a way, he invites us to have a dialogic relationship with him. We also find this tradition of negotiation and critical conversation in early Islamic society. The companions of the Prophet, as well as those who had not recognised him as a Prophet of Allah, were allowed to ask critical questions.
This was a treaty between the companions of the Prophet representing Medina, and the non-Muslims of Mecca – to establish peace between these two city-states. The Mecca rulers made it very clear that since they did not recognise the Prophethood of Muhammad, he would not be mentioned as the Prophet of God in the final version of the document.
The second element of Muhammad’s message may be characterised by his enduring struggle for the protection of the rights of the marginalised sections of society. He questions the existing power structure that creates inequalities and produces forms of injustice.
In this sense, Muhammad calls upon all of humanity to fight against injustice and create an egalitarian and just social order. His last Haj sermon is very relevant, in which he strongly argues for the rights of the slaves and women.
He said: “All mankind is from Adam and Eve; an Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab nor does a non-Arab have any superiority over an Arab; also a White has no superiority over a Black nor does Black have any superiority over a White, except by piety and good action.”
May Allah — the idea that I recognise primarily as a knowledge tradition — give us courage to draw constructive meanings from the Prophet’s message.
(Hilal Ahmed is Associate Professor at the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies. This is an opinion piece and the views expressed above are the author’s own. The Quint neither endorses nor is responsible for the same.)
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)
Published: undefined