advertisement
The revelations continue to trickle in about the Sri Lanka terror attacks. One report indicates that among the suspects who perpetrated the bombings are two women, one of them seeming absurdly young.
Too busy to read? Listen to this instead.
And finally, the most recent news is of ongoing investigations into possible sleeper cells in South India, particularly Kerala and Tamil Nadu, that are related to the Sri Lankan attack. This is disturbing, to say the least.
This investigation is probably one that preceded the Sri Lankan attacks, but has been accelerated by several factors. In the first instance, neither of the two states is a stranger to the Islamic State’s activity.
In that year, some 14 persons from Kasargod – but working in the Middle East – were known to have left for Afghanistan, and then joined the ISIS. One important member of that module was 25-year-old Habeeb who was a recruiter, and was caught just three months ago. It seems that Habeeb and others of his ilk were doing their job well. Since then, other modules have been caught, including one three months ago in Delhi NCR, of a group of young men, all in their mid-20s.
The profile is similar in terms of the age group, as are the grievances, and the sense of identification with the Islamic State. But here’s the difference.
In the second instance, are the ‘accelerating factors’ that will characterise the ongoing Kerala investigations. Some of these are now common knowledge. It is accepted that the warning of an attack in Sri Lanka came from Indian authorities.
His motivational videos spewing hatred, were seized from the Coimbatore module, a case that is more than two years old, and partially centres around Kannur native Abdul Rashid Abdullah, who left India at the time.
Those investigations have uncovered more leads, as cyber experts unearthed deleted data from hard drives, and followed hundreds and hundreds of Facebook posts. The sum of all this is that there is a clear and present danger.
India has been accustomed to adopting a rather superior tone in the face of severe ISIS activity elsewhere. That narrative has been one where phrases like ‘second largest Muslim population’, ‘Sufism’, ‘tolerance’ and ‘secularism’, jostled with each other into an enthusiastic argument.
To know the reasons for this, just listen to any of the election speeches from all sides of the political spectrum. Suddenly, religion matters, whether it is the majority or the minority. It seems that terror and politics have become so intertwined, that for each – to quote French philosopher Michel Foucault – ‘war has become politics by other means’. That’s what the ‘war on terrorism’ by George W Bush was about. That’s what it is still about. Watch the news.
(Dr Tara Kartha was Director, National Security Council Secretariat. She is now a Distinguished Fellow at IPCS. She tweets at @kartha_tara. This is an opinion piece and the views expressed above are the author’s own. The Quint neither endorses, nor is responsible for them.)
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)
Published: 27 Apr 2019,09:16 PM IST