advertisement
A few days ago, the Delhi government raised the minimum wage in Delhi by 50 percent. It was in the name of helping the poor, of course. But as the great economist Milton Friedman once said, programmes that are labelled as being “for the poor”, or “for the needy” almost always have effects which are exactly the opposite of what their well-intentioned sponsors thought they would have.
The minimum wage law is a perfect example. The well-meaning promoters of the law believe that if only the government forces employers to pay higher wages, the poor workers can have a higher standard of living.
If that is true, why does the international community give billions of dollars in foreign aid to poor countries like Bangladesh? A far more effective and cheaper method would be to raise the minimum wage in Bangladesh to a very high level and those people can be rich like Americans or Europeans. But obviously that won’t happen.
Industry will simply move to some other poor country (maybe in Africa) where cheap labour is available. Minimum wages are the reason American companies outsource low level jobs to India. People who work in call centres and other similar occupations are willing to work for less than the US minimum wage.
But it causes unemployment in the US. There might be Americans who are willing to work for less than the minimum wage, but the law prohibits them from doing so. It does not raise their standard of living, but in fact lowers it, by keeping them unemployed and their wages at zero.
Thus, the law forces employers to discriminate against people with
low skills; people who come from poor families and have little to no education.
And because these people cannot get jobs in the first place, they cannot get
on the job training, which would enable them to earn a higher pay.
Minimum wage laws also have the effect of increasing crime, as economist Walter Williams showed in his book and documentary, “The State Against Blacks”.
Since people can’t find jobs, but still need to
eat, they resort to theft, mugging people on the streets etc.
The bad effects of minimum wage laws observed in the US might not
happen in the case of Delhi in particular or India in general for a few
reasons.
First, is the federal structure of India. If the Delhi government sets a wage floor, workers can migrate to other states, whose governments are not as stupid, to find jobs.
Next is the weak enforcement of laws. Inspectors have been known to look the other way for a little bribe. This is one of the few times that I have been grateful for corruption, since the enforcement of minimum wage laws would not benefit, but hurt the workers by preventing employment in the formal sector.
However the greatest hope lies in the informal sector, which employs more than 70% of India’s work force. Even
big companies routinely hire workers on an informal basis. Politicians,
sociologists and self proclaimed public intellectuals often denounce the
informal economy saying that it operates outside the law.
But that very fact proves to be a great blessing; for the workers, since they get jobs; for the businesses, since they can make profits; for customers by way of lower prices. Everyone benefits in a market not burdened by regulation.
In conclusion, I would say that while the Delhi government made a very bad decision, there is little reason to worry since in the long run the effects will be negligible.
(The writer is an economist who looks for simple solutions to the complicated problems that ail our society.)
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)
Published: 19 Aug 2016,04:31 PM IST