advertisement
Writing in 2003 in Seminar, veteran Congress leader Mani Shankar Aiyar argued that “for the Congress to re-emerge as the natural party of governance, it is essential that it acquire an ideological profile, which over the turbulent nineties (and into the first three years of the 21st century) has grown fuzzy… To re-invent itself, the Congress has to face up squarely over the next few months to what it was and what it wishes to be – and convey this unambiguously and succinctly to the electorate.”
It was a time when the then Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee had a high approval rating, the economy was about to take off, and things were looking up on the external front.
Congress Vice-President Rahul Gandhi’s kisan yatra in UP is perhaps an attempt, for the first time after the crushing defeat in the 2014 Lok Sabha elections, to show the electorate what the party stands for and “what it wishes to be.”
What are the indications from the ongoing yatra? It is too simplistic to say that what the Congress is doing in UP is a kind of ‘soft Hindutva’.
The day Rahul visited Hanumangarhi temple in Ayodhya, he offered a chadar at dargarh Kichaucha Sharif in Ambedkarnagar district a few hours later. It indeed was a first visit by a member of the Gandhi family to the temple town in 26 years.
That the Congress is trying to woo UP’s Brahmins is also seen as peddling ‘soft Hindutva’. When did wooing a particular social group become ‘soft Hindutva’?
If we use this logic, the likes of Lalu Prasad, Nitish Kumar, Mulayam Singh Yadav, Mayawati and even Asaduddin Owaisi will become proponents of ‘soft Hindutva’. Owaisi never tires of making reference to Dalits in most of his speeches.
Hindutva – soft or hard – in the Indian context stands for exclusion. It means one or the other. It does not mean one and several more.
“The choice for the Congress is not, as is often mischievously or maliciously projected, between secularism and soft Hindutva, but between soft and hard secularism,” Aiyar had argued in the Seminar article.
The very first week of his yatra has been rich in symbolism – from visiting an upper caste freedom fighter’s family to meeting a Dalit family; from stopping at a roadside tea stall to have samosa and jalebi, to using khats to interact with farmers, mostly from the other backward classes.
He is trying to build an umbrella coalition by targeting the secular constituency of farmers. It is the kind of coalition the Congress had till the 1980s, especially in key battleground states like UP and Bihar. While the party lost support among the upper castes to the politics of mandir, Mandalisation cost it the votes of OBCs and Dalits. And it has been a free fall in UP since 1989.
However, the Congress made a partial comeback of sorts in the state in the 2009 Lok Sabha elections. An analysis by the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS) shows that the party got a third of the Brahmin votes, nearly a third of the Kurmi-Koeri (part of OBCs) votes and 25 percent of Muslim votes that year.
With a vote share in excess of 18 percent (more than the BJP’s 17.5 percent), the Congress won 21 of 69 seats it contested. It was due to the erosion in support among Brahmins and OBCs that the party fared badly in subsequent elections.
Rahul is perhaps attempting to arrest that slide. He is doing so by positioning the Congress to be left-of-centre, which explains the constant jibes at the NDA government with slogans like suit boot ki sarkar, Modi Mast, Kisan Past or aam janata se loot, kuch udyogpatiyon ko chhoot.
Will he be able to convey this message “unambiguously and succinctly” to the state’s electorate?
This will depend a great deal on what the follow-up action will be like. Rahul is known to relapse into prolonged phases of inaction after bursts of activism. The Congress would like him to change that if it harbours any ambition of making a mark in UP.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)
Published: 12 Sep 2016,03:11 PM IST