advertisement
House Republicans on Friday, 2 February, released a bitterly disputed, formerly highly classified memo that they say shows surveillance abuses in the early stages of the FBI's investigation into the Trump election campaign and Russia.
President Donald Trump, who championed release of the document over the fierce objections of his own Justice Department, declared the memo shows a "lot of people should be ashamed of themselves."
The memo, prepared by Republicans on the House intelligence committee, asserts that the FBI relied excessively on opposition research funded by Democrats in seeking a warrant to monitor the communications of a Trump campaign associate. It says federal authorities concealed the full details of who was paying for the information.
Democrats say the memo, which makes public material that is ordinarily considered among some of the most tightly-held national security information, cherry-picks Republican talking points in an effort to smear law enforcement.
Representative Adam Schiff, the committee’s top Democrat, said that the Republican document “mischaracterizes highly sensitive classified information” and that “the selective release and politicisation of classified information sets a terrible precedent and will do long-term damage to the intelligence community and our law enforcement agencies.”
The memo had been classified since it deals with warrants obtained from the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. The White House declassified it on Friday and sent it to the intelligence committee chairman, Republican Representative Devin Nunes, for immediate release.
It also comes amid an ongoing effort by Trump and congressional Republicans to discredit an investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller that focuses not only on whether the campaign coordinated with Russia but also on whether the president sought to obstruct justice. Republicans seized on the allegations in the memo to argue that the FBI's investigation was politically tainted from the start.
That argument takes aim at an FBI counter-intelligence investigation started many months before Mueller was appointed as special counsel, though he inherited the probe in May.
“Does Trump have confidence in Rosenstein?” he was asked. "You figure that one out," he retorted.
Earlier in the day, he tweeted:
The memo offered the first government confirmation that the FBI in October 2016 obtained a secret warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to monitor a Trump campaign associate, Carter Page, on the basis that the FBI believed he might be an agent of a foreign power — in this case, Russia. That warrant was reauthorised multiple times, including by Rosenstein.
The memo asserts that opposition research conducted by a former British spy, Christopher Steele, "formed an essential part" of the initial application to receive the warrant.
It's unclear how much or what information that Steele collected was included in the application. Steele's research was compiled into a dossier of salacious allegations involving Trump and Russia. It's unclear how much has been corroborated by the FBI.
Regardless, the FBI routinely relies on multiple sources of information when it obtains surveillance warrants, and that information oftentimes is not verified at the time agents make their applications.
Steele's opposition research effort was initially funded by the conservative Washington Free Beacon. It was later picked up by the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign through a Washington law firm.
In a statement, Page, who served as a foreign policy adviser and came on the FBI radar in 2013 as part of a separate counterintelligence probe, said:
The memo release, and Trump's tweet, escalates a clash with the man he picked to lead the FBI, Christopher Wray, after firing James Comey as agency director.
It also seemed at odds with House Speaker Paul Ryan who said a day earlier "this memo is not an indictment of the FBI or the Department of Justice."
Comey weighed in on Twitter as well, saying:
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)