advertisement
The Washington Post published a very perceptive column on 5 May with the headline, ‘Is Malaysia about to follow the path of Erdogan’s Turkey?’
The key takeaway here, as elsewhere, was that incumbent Prime Minister Najib tun Razak was set to get a third term in office. After all, he has been part of a coalition that has ruled the country every single day since it acquired independence in 1957.
Drawing parallel with Turkey’s strongman Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the column observed that if he wins, “Najib looks set to potentially transform Malaysia, which has been a semi-authoritarian state with some degree of the rule of law, into a more illiberal, politically Islamicised autocracy.”
From ordering seemingly favourable delimitation of constituencies to announcing a bonanza for government servants days ahead of announcement of election dates, he used all tools to get a mandate in his favour. However, that was not to be.
Analyses by Bloomberg, BBC and Al Jazeera suggest four major reasons:
The 9 May general election was not an ordinary election in the history of Malaysia. And Najib Razak did not seem like losing popular mandate any time soon. The main Opposition leader was in jail and the leader entrusted to lead the anti-Najib front was seen to be too old to put up a fight.
Mahathir Mohamad was seen to be lacking in establishing connect with young and aspirational voters.
Don’t we see more of the same situation everywhere, including our own backyard?
In political discussion we often come across phrases like: Oh, there is no alternative, there is no leader credible enough to take on the big one, or that parties in Opposition have nothing in common and there is no way they can come together.
In the run up to elections in Malaysia, various reports raised similar doubts and came to the conclusion that the Najib regime was set to continue for many more years.
Circumstances force disparate political groups to come together, sometimes out of choice and at times driven by survival instinct.
Need we remind ourselves that the coming together of once sworn enemies – Mayawati and Akhilesh Yadav now and Lalu Yadav and Nitish Kumar earlier – are some of the many instances of circumstances forcing leaders to forge alliances?
There is a message for members of my tribe too. Predicting the outcome of elections is an extremely hazardous business. And for once we should follow the Bollywood wisdom expressed in one popular number – ye jo public hai ye sab jaanati hai.
(The Quint is now on WhatsApp. To receive handpicked stories on topics you care about, subscribe to our WhatsApp services. Just go to TheQuint.com/WhatsApp and hit send).
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)