advertisement
“Prashant Bhushan is fearless. He takes up a just cause even if it is unpopular,” said historian Rajmohan Gandhi on 19 August at a virtual forum organised by the Indian-American community in solidarity with the lawyer-activist.
“India is fortunate to possess a person of his integrity and his gifts,” he added.
Days earlier, the Supreme Court had held Bhushan guilty of contempt of court for his two “derogatory” tweets. And, on 20 August, the court gave him an ultimatum to “rethink and apologise”.
In the midst of this, Bhushan has found support in six Indian-American groups who hosted a virtual conference in his support. Apart from Gandhi, keynote speakers included human rights lawyer Indira Jaising, among others.
Speaking of the conviction, Indira Jaising said, “The court says it is an interference with justice. Which comment interfered with justice? We are not told.”
“In a deliberative democracy, all institutions need to function in a transparent way to gain legitimacy. Accountability of institutions is not negotiable,” she further said.
“The Supreme Court of India belongs to you and me... No individual can scandalise court, only State power can scandalise court. Behind every act of deviance of a public functionary is the guarantee of impunity from legal consequences, and perhaps the promise of rewards. Civil society can offer no rewards.”
“We are seeing a complete miscarriage of justice. His tweets do not say anything out of the ordinary, other than what can and should rightfully be permitted to be expressed by the citizens of any country that claims to be a democracy,” said Aminah Ahmed, activist and youth leader of the Indian American Muslim Council, one of the organising bodies of the conference.
Apart from the Indian American Muslim Council, Hindus for Human Rights, Global Indian Progressive Alliance, Students Against Hindutva Ideology, Young India, Inc and Voices against Fascism in India were behind the conference. It was attended by over 100 Indian-American individuals.
Representing Students Against Hindu Ideology, Vishwa said, “The implications of this decision don’t fall on deaf ears. To be clear, this action is an omen. An omen that sets a dangerous precedent for the conviction of students and activists and creates a chilling effect that will haunt India’s promise of free speech. We stand in solidarity with the students, organisers, and legal community in India who are fighting for the right to peacefully dissent, which is so critical to a democratic and flourishing India.”
Among the organisational representatives was also Suniti Sanghavi, scientist-activist who has been chain-fasting for 175 consecutive days for peace in India.
In a call to action, Sanghavi declared a one-day fast on 22 August dedicated to Bhushan and “in solidarity with his struggle to preserve the sanctity of public opinion in India.”
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)