advertisement
At a time when Prime Minister Narendra Modi is heading to the United States for his fourth visit, India’s most wanted terrorist, Hafiz Saeed, is carrying out anti-India-USA rallies on the streets of Islamabad.
On Sunday, Saeed held a rally to protest the killing of the Taliban Chief, Mullah Akhtar Mansour, in a US military drone attack. Many strategic security experts see the killing of Mansour as a move by the US to ‘bully’ and ‘use’ Islamabad to to gradually root out Taliban ‘safe havens’ from Pakistan. Yet, India’s most wanted – a man with US bounty of $10 million on his head and a UN declared terrorist – roams free. Why can’t the US ‘bully’ Pakistan to reign him in?
In 2012, when America announced the $10 million bounty against Saeed, he held a press conference in Rawalpindi the next day to disclose his location and mock the Americans. He added that he wasn’t hiding in the caves, forcing the US to clarify that the bounty was not to find him but for information that could secure his conviction.
While India continues to say there is enough evidence against Saeed, we have failed to extradite him because the Pakistan Foreign Ministry insists there is no ‘concrete’ evidence. South Asia terror experts say Hafiz Saeed works closely with the Pakistani military, intelligence, and is cushioned by the political establishment.
Every time Hafiz Saeed is placed under house arrest because of mounting international pressure, the Pakistani courts rule in his favour. Courts say intelligence against him is not admissible as evidence in court, and thus keeping him under house arrest is ‘unconstitutional’. This is a story that has played out in Pakistan since the 2001 attack on India’s parliament.
Bruce O Riedel, author and one of America’s leading experts on US security and counter-terrorism, in an interview to The Foreign Policy Magazine said that the US has secured enough evidence against Saeed from Bin Laden’s Abbottabad hideout. It was this information that led to the bounty being announced close to four years after 26/11. This was not a ‘bureaucratic delay’ says Riedel, but a ‘calculated point of contention in an already contentious relationship’.
America seems to have incontrovertible proof linking Saeed to Bin Landen, and they have made all the right noises, report after report. The most recent US State Department Country Reports on Terrorism – 2015 states:
So why does America have its hands tied? The Executive Director of the Institute for Conflict Management in New Delhi argues that America’s bounty against Saeed is because of the Americans killed in 26/11 and that it would never act against the likes of Saeed at India’s behest.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)