advertisement
The global chemical weapons watchdog said on Friday, 1 March, it found "reasonable grounds" that chlorine was used as a weapon in a deadly attack on the Syrian town of Douma last year.
The determination was contained in a detailed report by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons' fact-finding mission that investigated the attack on 7 April 2018. Medical workers said at the time, the attack killed more than 40 people.
The mission's mandate does not include laying blame.
However, the data they eventually amassed and studied provided "reasonable grounds that the use of a toxic chemical as a weapon" took place, the OPCW said.
"This toxic chemical contained reactive chlorine. The toxic chemical was likely molecular chlorine."
Survivors reached by The Associated Press in the aftermath of the attack said they were overwhelmed by the smell of chlorine on the night of 7 April. Activists said many of the dead were found with foam around their mouths, an indicator for suffocation. Medical workers said they treated symptoms including difficulty in breathing and fainting.
The United States, Britain and France blamed Syrian government forces and launched punitive air strikes. Syria denied responsibility.
Douma was the final target of the government's sweeping campaign to seize control of the eastern Ghouta suburbs of Damascus from rebels after seven years of revolt. Militants gave up the town days after the alleged attack.
The OPCW said the report has been sent to the United Nations Security Council.
Russia, a staunch ally of Syrian President Bashar Assad, rejected claims that Syria was responsible for the attack and even brought what it called witnesses to The Hague to describe their experiences.
In a tweet Friday, the Russian embassy in The Hague said, the OPCW reached its finding, "in spite of all the evidence presented by Russia, Syria, and even British journalists that the Douma incident is no more than 'White helmets' staged provocation."
A joint investigative mechanism between the United Nations and OPCW, set up in 2015, was responsible for apportioning blame, but it was disbanded after Russia vetoed an extension of its mandate at the UN Security Council. Moscow claimed the team was not professional or objective in its investigations.
The team also accused the Islamic state extremist group of using mustard gas twice in 2015 and 2016.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)