advertisement
The authorities have been given a clean chit on the Elphinstone stampede tragedy in an inquiry report submitted by the Western Railways (WR). On 29 September, 23 people were crushed to death in a stampede on the stairwell of a narrow foot over-bridge at the Elphinstone station in Mumbai.
The report places the blame squarely on the circumstances, saying that railway commuters, “unprepared for the rains”, gathered on the Elphinstone-Parel foot overbridge, using the bridge's roof to shelter themselves from the sudden rain.
Though the report does not talk about any delays in widening of the bridge despite previous sanctions, on the same day the Railways has set up a separate high-level committee led by former former Central Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) Pratyush Sinha to probe into the matter and submit a report within three months.
The committee found that confusion between the words ‘phool’ and ‘pul’ resulted in the chaos. While the report does tangentially recommend widening of the staircase, it concludes that the rain caused people from outside to rush to the already crowded bridge, which triggered the incident.
According to India Today, the report explicitly said that “there was no structural damage to the FOB (foot overbridge) which can be attributed to the stampede”, while incorrectly noting the bridge was five meters wide. The Quint’s investigation into the width of the bridge revealed that it was only a little over 1.8 meters wide.
A survivor, Shilpa Vishwakarma, who spoke to The Quint after the stampede, appeared in front of the panel to attest that in her understanding, and said the tragedy occurred when some commuters misheard the word ‘phool’ (‘flower’ in Hindi and Marathi) for ‘pul’ (‘bridge’ in Hindi and Marathi) and thought the bridge was collapsing. Chaos ensued and people, especially flower and fish vendors carrying heavy boxes and tokris, lost balance leading to the stampede.
The report also makes some suggestions to avoid similar incidents at Elphinstone station. Some significant ones among them are:
‘We Didn’t Ignore Any Warning Signs’: Railways
When asked what role Western Railways had to play in the tragedy, the CPRO said:
The enquiry panel recorded the statements of 30 survivors and studied the video footage of the stampede. Its report gives a pass to claims of poor infrastructure and alleged negligence by the authorities and also puts rest to rumours that a short circuit on the bridge led to panic.
Following the stampede, it came to light that commuters had been trying to bring the narrow bridge and the stampede-like condition at Elphinstone station for many years. A 2016 CAG report says that the minimum width of all bridges in the suburban network should be al least 6 meters; Elphinstone station’s FOB in question is less than two meters wide. A new bridge was approved by Suresh Prabhu last year, but a tender for it was not released until hours after the stampede had taken place.
It is not surprising then that daily commuters are not amused by the conclusion the Railways has reached, taking away all blame from the authorities.
Earlier on 7 October, the Mumbai Police also came to the same conclusion in its investigation into the stampede. The rain and the sudden overcrowding of the station because of four trains simultaneously arriving at the station led to the deaths of the 23 victims, said its report.
The report gave a clean chit to the Railway Protection Force, the Government Railway Protection force, two booking clerks and the station master.
The police further asked the ticket booking staff to provide them with a rough estimate of the station’s footfall and even went on to ask the Meteorological Department for a confirmation that it rained at 10:26 am that day, when the stampede occurred.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)