advertisement
Uddhav Thackeray’s elder brother Jaidev Thackeray recently made a jaw-dropping claim – that Aishwarya, the son from his former wife Smita, is not his child!
He has made 9 more shocking claims in the Bombay High Court. Most of these are allegations against Uddhav Thackeray:
Jaidev Thackeray, Bal Thackeray’s second son, has challenged his father’s will which hands over much of the property to Uddhav. The will was signed in December 2011 and Thackeray senior died in November 2012. Jaidev claims that Bal Thackeray “was of an unsound mind at that time and had been influenced by Uddhav.”
Jaidev claims that he had a meeting with his father on 16 October 2011 where Balasaheb told him that he would get a share in the property. Jaidev also claimed that Balasaheb later told him that Uddhav handed him a set of documents and asked him to sign.
Essentially, he meant that Uddhav made Bal Thackeray sign the will without letting the latter know the contents of it.
The matter turned murkier when Jaidev claimed that Aishwarya Thackeray, the son from his former wife Smita, was not his child.
During cross examination, he referred to Aishwarya as “some unknown person” who was occupying the first floor of Matoshree, their residence, that Bal Thackeray left Aishwarya in his will.
When Uddhav’s lawyer asked him if Aishwarya was his son, Jaidev said:
Then Justice Gautam Patel announced that the rest of the deposition would be in-camera and would not be open for media and the public.
Bal Thackeray, in his will, left the first floor of Matoshree to Aishwarya so his mother Smita could visit him.
Rahul, son of Jaidev and his former wife Smita, is not remembered at all in Bal Thackeray’s will. Rahul is in his late twenties and is making a Marathi biopic on Bal Thackeray, which his mother Smita Thackeray is producing.
Jaidev said he had no interest in politics, but his former wife Smita wanted to join it in 1994.
Jaidev told the court that he moved out of Matoshree in 1999 due to the growing rift between him and Smita. But Smita continued to live there until their divorce in 2004.
When asked if he ever wanted to return to Matoshree, Jaidev said:
Jaidev alleged that Uddhav conspired to remove his name from the family ration card.
Jaidev added that he later called up his father, who denied having sent anyone. Jaidev said that despite such instances, he was trying to keep cordial relations with Uddhav, but Uddhav didn’t even return his phone calls.
Jaidev told the court that he had been close to his father since 1970s. He looked into his father’s affairs and travelled with him, so much so that Bal Thackeray had started looking at him as his political heir.
Jaidev claimed in his affidavit that Uddhav was into photography and not interested in politics. Jaidev is partly right as Uddhav Thackeray got into active politics only in the 1990s. Until then, many believed nephew Raj Thackeray would be Bal Thackery’s political heir as he was politically active, ambitious and delivered speeches in his uncle’s style.
In his affidavit, Jaidev told the court that Bindumadhav, Balasaheb’s eldest son was not interested in politics either. He was more interested in his business and the film industry. Bindumadhav was supposed to be given the first floor of Matoshree after reconstruction, but he wasn’t interested as he was already well settled elsewhere.
After Bindumadhav’s death in a car accident in April 1996, his wife Madhavi left Matoshree with her daughter Neha and son Nihar.
Further cross-examination of Jaidev Thackeray is underway, but it’s in-camera and out of bounds for the media.
The Quint tried to get Uddhav Thackeray’s reaction but his office refused to comment.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)
Published: 21 Jul 2016,07:03 PM IST