Members Only
lock close icon

In Big Win for Rahul Gandhi, SC Stays Conviction In Defamation Case

After the Gujarat High Court had refused to stay his conviction, Gandhi had moved the top court against the order.

The Quint
Law
Published:
<div class="paragraphs"><p>Congress leader Rahul Gandhi arrives at IGI Airport in New Delhi, on Thursday, 23 March. A Surat court on Thursday convicted Gandhi in a criminal defamation case filed against him over his alleged Modi surname remark. </p></div>
i

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi arrives at IGI Airport in New Delhi, on Thursday, 23 March. A Surat court on Thursday convicted Gandhi in a criminal defamation case filed against him over his alleged Modi surname remark.

(Photo: PTI/Ravi Choudhary)

advertisement

The Supreme Court on Friday, 4 August, stayed Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's conviction in the criminal defamation case filed against him by BJP leader Purnesh Modi over his 2019 “Modi surname” remark.

This, as The Quint had noted in a previous piece , will pave the way for him to get his seat back in the parliament and let his case be decided on merits in trial.

After the Gujarat High Court had, on 7 July, refused to stay his conviction, Gandhi had moved the top court against the order.

"...that no reason has been given by trial judge for imposing max sentence, order of conviction needs to be stayed pending final adjudication," a bench headed by Justice Gavai said Friday.

Previously: A Sessions Court in Surat on 20 April had rejected Gandhi's plea seeking a stay on his conviction.

How this started: A Surat Magistrate court on 23 March, had convicted Rahul Gandhi in a criminal defamation case and sentenced him to two years in jail for his comment that allegedly said "all people with Modi surname are thieves" that he made during an election rally in Kolar in April 2019.

The first court order: Justice Hadirash Varma, in his 168-page judgment, had pointed out that as a Member of Parliament (MP), Gandhi wields significant influence, and therefore, he should have exercised caution and self-control.

The judge asserted, "The accused had taken the reference of the surname of the current Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi, to satisfy his political greed and insulted and defamed 13 crore people living in the whole of India having the surname 'Modi."

He was disqualified as a member of the Lok Sabha a day later.

(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)

Become a Member to unlock
  • Access to all paywalled content on site
  • Ad-free experience across The Quint
  • Early previews of our Special Projects
Continue

Published: undefined

ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL FOR NEXT