advertisement
The latest Akshay Kumar movie Toilet: Ek Prem Katha (A love story), which hits the theatres today, tells the story of a young bride who walks out of her marriage when she discovers that her in-law’s home does not have a toilet. The satire deals with open defecation and Kumar calls it his “contribution” to the Swachh Bharat Mission spearheaded by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
The prime minister responded with words of appreciation for the film.
In the film, the young woman’s revolt leads to social change but in real India women rebelling against open defecation remains uncommon, even if they are educated.
Women have limited decision-making power in the construction of toilets in homes, according to a 2016 study conducted in Puri, a coastal Odisha district, by researchers at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Women and girls are most vulnerable to problems associated with open defecation.
In 80 percent of the households, decisions on the construction of sanitation facilities were made exclusively by men, the study found. For 11 percent, the decision was made by men in consultation with their wives, and in no more than 9 percent women took the decision.
Improved sanitation facilities include the following: Flush to piped sewer system, flush to septic tank, flush to pit latrine, ventilated improved pit (VIP)/biogas latrine, pit latrine with slab and twin pit/composting toilet, which is not shared by any other household.
The study sampled 475 households, of which 217 had no latrine, 211 had a functional one and 47 had one that didn’t work.
Only 42% of households in rural Odisha have individual household latrines (IHHL) under the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan (Clean India campaign), third-lowest among states, according to government data.
Compared to households without latrines, households with functional latrines had more educated men and women, larger family sizes and higher incomes.
Households with latrines more often owned agricultural land (85 percent) and a tubewell (83 percent), and were less likely to be employed as share croppers or labourers, the study found.
Gender inequalities within the family influenced decisions on sanitation too, interviews conducted during the study revealed. “After all, the husband is the head of the family, he is elder in age and in relationship and he will spend for the latrine, therefore, the decision making power lies with him,” said a 52-year-old woman.
This is despite the fact that in rural Puri, 83 percent of women — and 92 percent of men – are literate, according to the NFHS-4 data. This is higher than the state average of 67.4 percent and 84.3 percent respectively.
A woman’s power to take decisions concerning marriage or visits to a healthcare centre are not necessarily strengthened by a high literacy rate or a better sex ratio at the state-level, IndiaSpend reported on 13 February. This suggests the overpowering role of social norms that differ across India.
The IHDS survey in 2012 covered over 34,000 urban and rural women between the ages of 15 and 81, in 34 Indian states and union territories.“The bias against daughters can only end if women’s education is accompanied by social and economic empowerment,” concluded a study conducted over 30 years in Gove, Maharashtra, by Carol Vlassoff, a professor at the University of Ottawa, IndiaSpend reported in December 2016.
Financial constraint was commonly cited as the reason for not building latrines or keeping them functional. The perception was that latrine installation is expensive and therefore men who controlled the household budget were not keen to build one. Those who had some money were reluctant to invest in latrines as they had other priorities.
Even in other decisions involving money, women had limited bargaining power. For instance, in 91 percent households only men took decisions on determining healthcare expenses for women; 85 percent of women respondents were housewives, which probably limited their bargaining power. Puri district’s female work participation rate is 7.5 percent, third-lowest among all districts in Odisha, according to the 2011 census.
The study found that NGOs involved in latrine construction spawned these inequalities. They were given targets for latrine construction and field workers mostly approached men for faster permission to construct.
Women complained against this. “The NGO person looked for the males. They had meetings with them [husband and other males], and told us to dig a pit and keep it ready. One day, they came with a mason and started constructing the latrine. He was the only mason to construct all the latrines in the village, so due to his unavailability he left the structure unfinished,” said a 65-year-old female respondent.
(Saha is an MA Gender and Development student at Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex. This story was first published on IndiaSpend and has been republished with permission.)
(Love your mother tongue? This Independence Day, tell The Quint why and how you love your bhasha. You may even win a BOL t-shirt! Sing, write, perform, spew poetry – whatever you like – in your mother tongue. Send us your BOL at bol@thequint.com or WhatsApp it to 9910181818.)
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)