advertisement
The Centre’s decision on Wednesday, 11 December, to refer the controversial Personal Data Protection Bill to Joint Parliamentary Committee, instead of the Standing Committee on Information Technology, has drawn criticism from cyber-security and other experts in the domain of data privacy.
Raman Chima, Policy Director at Access Now, felt that by referring the Bill to a select committee, the BJP-led Union government has broken away from the tradition of allowing an existing standing committee on the matter to examine a bill independently.
Chima was referring to the Standing Committee on IT, which is headed by Congress leader and Thiruvananthapuram MP Shashi Tharoor.
Echoing Chima, Apar Gupta, Executive Director at Internet Freedom Foundation, questioned why the government had referred the Bill to a select joint committee when the Standing Committee on IT was already studying the subject of data privacy in India.
"The reference to the select committee is highly unusual and strays from set process. This becomes curious as the Standing Committee is in any instance considering the issue of citizens privacy and online security," he said.
Similarly, Supreme Court activist Pavan Duggal said that asking a new committee to study the Bill afresh is akin to “re-inventing the wheel” as the existing Standing Committee has already being examining the matter – any decision to send it to a JPC would normally be taken after the Standing Committee has looked into the matter.
The new Joint Parliamentary Committee comprises 20 members from the Lok Sabha, including Meenakshi Lekhi, Tejasvi Surya, SS Ahluwalia, Gaurav Gogoi and Kanimozhi among others. In addition, the committee will also include 10 more members from the Rajya Sabha, who are yet to be nominated. The body must submit a report by the first day of the last week of the Budget Session, to be held in 2020.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)