advertisement
Why would a fugitive attempt to travel on a revoked passport despite being aware of the fact that he/she could be detained and taken into custody by the police at any airport? Diamantaire fugitive Nirav Modi’s frequent international travels on a revoked passport begs the question – what boosted Modi’s confidence?
These questions come to the fore as the Interpol functions in a way to help capture the smallest of fugitives in its net, and not let them go scot-free without a thorough check. Then how did Modi manage to swim past the Interpol’s net?
Did India’s premier investigative agency – the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) – fail to provide relevant threads to the Interpol and facilitate Modi’s great escape?
Too caught to read this story? You can listen to it instead.
If we are to believe the CBI’s version, then Modi and his uncle Mehul Choksi’s revoked passport details were reflecting on the Interpol’s Stolen and Lost Travel Document (SLTD) database on 24 February 2018. If that was the case, it was impossible for them to travel internationally multiple times.
The SLTD database was created by the Interpol in 2002 after the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks in the USA to secure international borders. Currently, 174 countries are members of the Interpol’s SLTD programme, the website claims.
According to the CBI, India became a member of the SLTD programme in 2014.
The CBI acts as the Interpol’s NCB for India, linking the national police to the global network.
The CBI was technically required to follow just six steps to stop Modi and Choksi from travelling on a revoked passport – explained in the flowchart from the Interpol’s website.
The CBI claims to have followed the four steps (as per the above flowchart) in Modi’s case.
If the first four steps were completed properly, then the last two steps should have been automatically followed by the Interpol’s NCB and other International law enforcement agencies, which are:
When The Quint asked a senior CBI official, he said, “Probably, the countries didn’t honour the request on Modi which was reflecting on the SLTD database.”
But why would countries like UK, Hong Kong and the USA not adhere to the database built by the Interpol?
A Diffusions Notice was issued against Modi on 17 February 2018. According to legal experts, the Interpol takes Diffusions Notice as seriously as a Red Corner Notice.
When the CBI claims to have covered all leaks from Diffusions Notice to SLTD database, then what went amiss? Is the CBI making efforts to find out what prompted Modi’s escape? Did an insider collude with him?
Recently, CBI Joint Director Rajiv Singh, who was investigating Modi’s case, was suddenly transferred to his cadre in Assam.
It was also reported that the investigation against Modi and Choksi was compromised because Singh’s email was hacked. Although, the CBI refuted this, the report claimed that one of the CBI email IDs allotted to Singh sent a spam message to over 30,000 people saying the sender is a Norwegian and that it is the receiver’s ‘good fortune’ that he/she has received this email, having won a considerable amount of money. The email also asked the receivers to forward the message.
The SLTD database has limited access, hence The Quint has requested the CBI to provide a copy of the data which mentions Modi and Choksi’s name along with other details such as the date of creation, passport number and status etc.
This story will be updated if and when the agency provides the details.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)