advertisement
Victims cannot be expected to state facts in a "parrot-like manner" and minor contradictions are bound to happen after a lapse of time, a Delhi court has said while sending four men to jail in a molestation and assault case after relying on the complainant's statement.
Additional Sessions Judge Sanjiv Jain sent the four men, all Delhi residents, to one year’s rigorous imprisonment for molesting, threatening and voluntarily causing hurt to the victim, a married woman, after forcefully entering her house when she was alone.
Rejecting the argument about there being discrepancies in the woman's testimony, the judge said:
The court said there is enough direct and circumstantial evidence against the men to prove their complicity in the commission of the offence, adding that the complainant remained "consistent and cogent" and her testimony was of "sterling quality".
According to the prosecution, on the intervening night of 14-15 September 2014, the men - Tukun Das, Pawan Kumar, Vinod Kumar and Dev Kant Giri, who were the neighbours of the woman, entered her house when she was alone and abused her physically and verbally.
There had been a quarrel between the woman and Vinod before the incident took place, which resulted in the registration of a complaint against him by the woman.
After this, in order to "teach her a lesson", Vinod along with three others, entered her house and used criminal force to outrage her modesty, it said.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)