advertisement
A group of United Nations expert on Wednesday urged that the Indian government must immediately release a prominent Kashmiri human rights activist who was arrested last month on charges of involvement in activities against the public order.
In a statement issued by the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), four Special Rapporteurs said Parvez's detention appeared to be an attempt by the government to stop his work.
"Parvez is a well-known and outspoken human rights defender who has had a long-standing and positive engagement with the UN human rights mechanisms," said the UN experts on arbitrary detention, freedom of peaceful assembly, freedom of expression and enforced disappearances.
Government and police officials in Kashmir declined to comment on the statement by the UN Special Rapporteurs Michel Forst, Sètondji Adjovi, Maina Kiai and David Kaye.
The JKCCS has published research into the role of Indian security forces in containing a separatist insurgency in India's Kashmir state that first flared a quarter of a century ago.
The unrest is the worst in the Muslim-majority region for six years, and critics have accused Indian forces of heavy-handedness as they struggle to contain the protests.
India and Pakistan have fought two wars over Kashmir since Independence in 1947. Both claim the territory in full but rule it in parts.
Parvez, who is also the chair of the Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances (AFAD), was stopped by authorities at New Delhi airport on 14 September, when he was on his way to Geneva to attend the UN Human Rights Council.
He was detained on 16 September, released four days later and then detained again the same day.
The experts said they were concerned that Parvez was still in preventive detention under the highly-controversial Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act, which allows for people to held for up to two years without judicial intervention.
India had so far provided no clear details on the exact nature of the charges against Parvez, and the government's rationale relied "mainly on vague accusations of alleged 'anti-India' activities" to disturb public order, said the statement.
"We are seriously concerned that the arrest of Parvez may represent a direct retaliation for his legitimate activities as a human rights defender and the exercise of his fundamental freedoms, including freedoms of expression and association."
(Published in an arrangement with the Thomas Reuters Foundation, a charity registered in England and Wales.)
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)