advertisement
Film producers in Tamil Nadu, in a contentious move, have decided to ban journalists who write “unnecessarily harsh” reviews of Tamil films, criticise actors, directors, producers or other Industry professionals.
The decision was taken by the Tamil Film Producers’ Council Consulting Union and South Indian Film Media PRO Union on Monday, 8 July. This comes on the back of several producers and filmmakers making bitter comments against reviewers, and is widely seen as a juvenile move by the organisations involved.
The move to sideline reviewers and critics was slipped in however, along with the threat to take legal action against critics and reviewers who are “too harsh” on a film.
While the ‘I-won’t-invite-you-to-my-birthday-party’ tone of the circular is childish and immature, critics and reviewers say it has no legal standing.
Baradwaj Rangan, film critic and editor of Film Companion South, says that the circular will not have any effect on the workings of film reviewers. “If you think you can muffle the critics by issuing this circular, what about the word of mouth reviews shared by the general public on social media? In fact, that is the biggest way in which a film gets praised or trashed. Moreover, how does one decide what constitutes “degrading” in a review? Who decides what is degrading?” he asks.
Pointing out that the circular has no legal standing, Baradwaj says, “I think they are just beating the drums keeping the (Producers Council) elections in mind.”
Sudhir Srinivasan, film critic and Editor of Cinema Express, points out the council should not be leading the way for producers who intend to seek petty retributions by issuing such circulars.
“The phrase – ‘varambu meeri tharakuraivaga vimarsikkum’ (degrading reviews that go beyond what’s warranted) – lends itself to multiple interpretations. I think the council should not, with such vague choice of words, lead the way for producers to potentially seek petty retribution. If they do feel that any reviewer, at any time, has overstepped the line and engaged in personal abuse, I think it would be more suitable to handle it on a case to case basis. Issuing a press release, threatening legal action and vague choice of vocabulary, only seems to reek of insecurity and a reluctance to accept criticism in general.”
“If they are particularly concerned about cracking down on expenditure, how about looking at better measures to fight piracy? First, it was Sandeep Vanga in his interview, suggesting that critics are more dangerous than piracy, and now this. I understand that they will be providing further clarity on this circular, but while we wait, there is no doubt that we must come down very strongly on this,” he adds.
A well-known film reviewer and box officer tracker who did not want to be named tells TNM that the circular hardly matters to a reviewer. “Naturally, the film producers are a big force to reckon with but this circular hardly matters. In fact if a film is bad, it will get a bad review irrespective of influencers. They just want to blame press and media for their own failures,” he says.
He further adds, “This is not the first time that such a notice has been issued. They have done so in the past too, on how to treat the press, on how to keep away the bad reviewers… But now, online reviews have taken over traditional media. Anyone has the freedom to rip apart a film if the content doesn't live up in the opening day. Today, a person reviewing a Tamil film may not be in Chennai at all where the said events are being held. It is a free country. Reviewers can either praise or run down a film as they deem fit and no one can stop them.”
Speaking to TNM on the condition on anonymity, a popular YouTube reviewer says that he was invited to a meeting last week with the Producers’ Council regarding his reviews.
“They asked if I will post reviews three days after the movie is released as opposed to doing it immediately. I said that was not possible,” he says. “All this is just theatrics ahead of the Producer Council elections. They want to make it seem like they are all working towards the welfare of producers by clamping down on the democratic rights of the media and controlling critical views,” he adds.
While the circular was issued on Monday, 8 July, evening, as of Tuesday, 9 July morning, a new message was sent to the media that the members regret sending a poorly worded circular and that a meeting will be convened at the Producers’ Council at noon to clarify and rectify its errors.
(This article was originally published on The News Minute and has been republished with permission)
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)
Published: undefined