advertisement
The Supreme Court on Wednesday, 11 December, said it is considering appointing a former judge of the apex court for the inquiry into the encounter killings of the four accused in the gang rape-and-murder case of a veterinarian in Telangana
"We are conscious of the fact that the Telangana High Court had taken note of it," a bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) S A Bobde said, adding that the top court only wanted that a Delhi-based former apex court judge should hold an inquiry into the case.
The judge, who would inquire into the incident, would sit in Delhi, it said.
The bench has posted the PILs, seeking an independent SIT probe into the encounter, for hearing on Thursday.
Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi and advocate Krishnakumar Singh, appearing for the Telangana government, said it had followed the directions laid down by the apex court for an inquiry into encounters and had already referred the case to the state CID.
The PIL, filed by Mani and Yadav, claimed that the alleged encounter was "fake" and an FIR should be lodged against the police officials who were involved in the incident.
Telangana police said on Friday that the accused were killed in an exchange of fire with police.
The incident took place around 6.30 am when the accused were taken to the site of offense for the reconstruction of the scene of crime as part of the investigation.
The four accused were shot dead on NH-44 near Hyderabad -- the same highway where the charred body of 27-year-old veterinarian found.
"However, an investigating agency and officers even at high level like Commissioner of Police taking the law into their hand, conducting fake encounter and killing alleged rape accused.... without bringing them before the court for punishment is very unfortunate," the plea said.
"No one including the investigating agency like police has the right to punish any accused without due process of law. The court alone after applying all the procedure and law and affording an opportunity all the right of free and fair trial and hearing can impose a punishment of imprisonment or death sentence," Mani and Yadav said in their PIL.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)