advertisement
The Supreme Court on Monday sought responses from internet majors Google, Microsoft, Yahoo and Facebook on a plea seeking curbs on sharing of sexual offence videos on social networking sites.
A bench of justices MB Lokur and UU Lalit issued notice to these companies and sought their reply on the plea by 9 January.
Additional Solicitor General Maninder Singh, representing the Centre, detailed the steps taken by the Union home ministry and the CBI, which is the nodal agency for cybercrimes.
He said that the debate over making public the names of sexual offenders is on in India and abroad and whatever decision is taken in this regard will be implemented.
To this, the bench said that if the names of sexual offenders are to be made public then it should be done only after the conviction in the offence, not just after the case is lodged.
"It will tarnish the image of a person if he is acquitted in the sexual offence case," it said.
The bench also directed that if the state police finds nothing against a person after probing a sexual offence case, then CBI will not interrogate that person with regard to the cybercrime aspect related to the offence.
It also directed the Centre to include steps to curb sexual violence against children in the list of measures to be taken for curbing crimes against women.
"As per the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) data there is a sharp rise in cases of sexual violence against children," it said.
The court was hearing a letter sent to then Chief Justice of India HL Dattu by Hyderabad-based NGO Prajwala, which had also submitted two rape videos in a pen drive. It had taken suo motu note of the letter on the posting of these videos on WhatsApp and had asked the CBI to launch a probe forthwith to nab the culprits.
Earlier, the apex court had pulled up the government for failure to file its response in a case relating to the posting of rape videos on WhatsApp and social networking sites for 11 months.
The CBI in its reply to the plea had said that "commiting such abhorrent crimes, recording them and disseminating them across the world through Internet-enabled media, serves to titillate and indirectly embolden other males to also commit such heinous crimes. These not only add to the misery of existing victims but also endanger and threaten the safety of other innocent women and children".
It had also favoured the suggestion of the petitioner that an officer from the CBI should be posted with the internet service providers/social networking sites to facilitate and expedite the prevention, detection and prosecution of such crimes.
Earlier, the apex court had asked the information technology ministry to respond on how to block videos of rape cases, circulating on social network websites, under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.
The ministry's reply was sought after social activist Sunitha Krishnan had submitted that there should be a particular platform where one could report the circulation of such rape videos and seek their blocking.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)