advertisement
The suicide of the entire Bansal family sent shockwaves across the country. On 26 September, former government official BK Bansal, who was charged in a graft case, committed suicide with his son in his Delhi apartment. According to a very senior Delhi Police officer, the suicide note written by Bansal does not constitute strong enough evidence to book CBI officials with abetment to suicide (306 IPC).
The official added that Bansal’s wife and daughter didn’t mention anything about being harassed by the CBI officials. Hence, the preliminary investigation done by the police is hinting towards ‘harassment’ instead of ‘abetment to suicide’. Sources also added that in case of harassment, the CBI can take departmental action against the alleged officials, and no FIR or criminal case would be registered against them.
But hang on! What more do police need to prove abetment to suicide? In the suicide note, Bansal has mentioned:
Is this not instigation enough to drive a person to commit suicide? Would Delhi Police be so cavalier had CBI officials not been implicated? Why are the cops so tight-lipped? Why have they not sent the suicide note to forensics to examine the handwriting yet?
Interestingly, another senior Delhi Police officer, when asked about the former Haryana Minister Gopal Kanda and AAP MLA Sharad Chauhan’s abetment to suicide cases, clearly stated that ‘those were politically motivated cases’ and might not stand in a court of law.
In the Kanda case, the air hostess Geetika Sharma in her suicide note alleged harassment by the minister, but there was no sign of immediate provocation or abetment.
The AAP MLA Chauhan case too seems to be the outcome of the tiff between the Delhi Police and Delhi government, seeing as Chauhan was charged with abetment to suicide even though the case happened after the Bansal case.
Does this mean only political pressure can motivate cops to do their duty?
So how does the Indian Penal Code define abetment to suicide (306)?
But the word ‘abetment’ is not so well-defined here. It is defined under section 107 IPC, which says:
In spite of repeated questions on the progress made by the CBI in the internal inquiry against their own officer in the Bansal suicide case, the agency has refused to divulge any information.
If during the CBI investigation it is established that the alleged officials did harass the Bansal family, then the punishment could be anything between a warning to suspension, say sources.
Meanwhile, the Delhi Police is simply sitting on the case, searching for ways to bury it rather than investigating and pinning the culprits with appropriate charges.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)