advertisement
Who does a temple belong to? Who has the right to decide the workings of a temple?
As the battle over women’s entry into Sabarimala rages following the Supreme Court verdict of 28 September, several questions have been raised over whether the Pandalam royal family and the Thazhamon Madom family – popularly referred to as the thantri family – have the right to decide to shut the temple if women enter.
The community has alleged that the rituals in the temple have been ‘Brahminised’, and that the community was threatened and silenced if they dared to ask questions. Now, with the Supreme Court verdict allowing entry to women of all ages into the hilltop shrine, the Mala Araya community has found new strength, and say they will take their fight forward.
Mala Araya, a term derived from the word "Malai Arayan", translates in Malayalam to 'King of the Hills'. The Adivasi community is one of the largest tribal communities in the state, with around 5,000 members residing in the hills surrounding Sabarimala.
PK Sajeev, the founder and general secretary of Aikya Mala Araya Maha Sabha (AMAMS), an organisation working towards the welfare of the tribe, has researched extensively on the subject of the Sabarimala temple.
According to Sajeev, the Mala Araya tribe stood with Ayyappa and helped fight the Cholas. "Ayyappan united the people who trained in martial arts in the region and formed a strong community,” he says.
The Sabarimala temple is believed to have been established in the 12th Century. Since 1950, the temple has been under the control of the Travancore Devaswom Board (TDB).
According to Sajeev, since the construction of the temple until the 19th century, it was the Mala Araya community that performed the rituals at the temple.
When the Pandalam family ruled the region in the 1800s, the Adivasi community faced violence from the rulers, Sajeev says. The Mala Arayas were driven out of their homes in the hills, and had to flee elsewhere to protect themselves, he says.
The Sabarimala temple, however, already had followers believing that the temple was sacred, says Sajeev.
"The Pandalam royal family took over the temple by force from the Mala Arayas. They didn't take the other 18 temples in the area. but the rulers of Pandalam took over this temple and effectively sidelined the Mala Arayas," he says.
This birth story of Ayyappa, Sajeev says, is the reason behind the 41-day fast observed by Ayyappa devotees.
He further states that the 18 steps leading up to the temple's sanctum sanctorum, that are considered sacred, are a dedication to the 18 hills surrounding Sabarimala. "By crossing all 18 steps on the way to the shrine, it is a symbolic tribute to the 18 hills in the area".
Sajeev says that the Mala Arayas also performed the lighting of the Makara Jyothi as a ritual at the shrine.
For the Mala Arayas, the Supreme Court verdict regarding women’s entry into Sabarimala has come as a shot in the arm – although the community itself stands divided on whether women between the ages of 10 and 50 should enter the temple.
The AMAMS and the Aikya Thiruvithamkoor Mala Araya Maha Sabha (ATMAMS), another organisation working for the welfare of the Mala Arayas formed in the 1950s, are planning to file a petition in the Supreme Court seeking the restoration of the tribe's rights at the Sabarimala temple and three other shrines under the control of the TDB – the Karimala, Ponnambalamedu and Nilakkal Mahadeva temples.
"As we are asking for rituals and traditions to be restored at the temple, the practice of barring women in the menstruating age group should continue,” says KK Gangadharan, general secretary of the ATMAMS.
In contrast, the AMAMS does not want to question the Supreme Court's decision to allow women of all ages entry into the shrine. "If a woman in the menstruating age group goes to the temple, it must be due to her devotion to Ayyappa," says Sajeev.
But the two organisations are in agreement over their demand for the restoration of the rights of Mala Arayas at the temple.
"We believe that our ancestors used to perform rituals in the temple and all we are asking is for those rituals to be restored again,” reiterates Gangadharan.
"Our community was innocent with no one to protect our ancestors at the time. They were forced to stay away from the temple then. But now we have the Constitution and laws to protect us," Sajeev says.
"We will support the Mala Araya tribe in reclaiming the rights lost after the formation of the Travancore Devaswom Board,” says PS Sreedharan Pillai, the state president of the BJP in Kerala.
The two organizations leading the fight for the reclamation of the rights of the Mala Arayas are unconcerned about the motives of the political parties supporting their claims and are only eager to ensure that the members of their community to be able to perform rituals at the temple.
"We will not attach ourselves to any party. We are simply working for the welfare of the Mala Araya tribe," says Sajeev.
(The article was originally published on The News Minute.)
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)