advertisement
A day after Nepal Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli faced flak for claiming that the “real Ayodhya” lies in Nepal, the foreign ministry of Nepal issued a statement saying that the remarks were not political and had no intention of hurting anyone’s sentiments.
It was also pointed out, in the statement, that the remarks were not meant to debase the significance or the cultural value of Ayodhya.
According to Nepalese media house Khabarhub, Oli, speaking on the occasion of Bhanu Jayanti at his residence, claimed “distortion of facts” with “India’s Ayodhya” as the birthplace of Lord Ram.
Oli reportedly added that there is ‘dispute’ over Ayodhya’s location and that the actual Ayodhya is not where India claims.
“Ayodhya is at Thori, west of Birgunj, Balmiki Ashram is in Nepal and the holy place where King Dashrath had executed the rites to get the son is in Ridi,” he was quoted by Khabarhub as saying.
Ram was not an Indian and Ayodhya is also in Nepal, he reportedly claimed.
Oli’s claims come just weeks after his government amended its constitution, paving the way for inclusion of Kalapani, Lipulekh and Limpiyadhura in its maps – areas that have been a cause of dispute between India and Nepal.
While India officially has called Nepal’s territorial claims an “artificial enlargement not based on historical facts,” Defence Minister Rajnath Singh had claimed that the dispute will be resolved via dialogue as the two nations are connected by ‘roti and beti’.
(With inputs from Khabarhub.)
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)