advertisement
“What’s in a name?” Shakespeare’s oft-quoted question no longer holds true in the political climate we live in.
South Delhi’s The Piano Man Jazz Club recently courted controversy after it announced an event on its Facebook page. The event in question was a performance by a band named ‘Bhangijumping’, scheduled for 5 June.
‘Bhangi' is a caste group in India, which is relegated to the role of cleaning toilets and excreta. They are also known by the term ‘manual scavengers’ due to the nature of their work. While manual scavenging was outlawed in 2013, it is still prevalent in many parts of the country as is seen through documentaries like Divya Bharathi’s Kakkoos (2017).
This ignorance, which landed the jazz club’s owner Arjun Sagar Gupta and the band in trouble, is symptomatic of a larger problem. Within the bubble of privilege, many of us often become blind to the very existence of caste – possibly never having personally faced or witnessed caste-violence.
Moreover, the school system, especially of the elite, urban variety, teaches caste in an overly-simplistic manner. Children are taught about the Savarna system and beyond that, they know the term “untouchable” without truly understanding its nuances. What’s more, because we don’t generally meet these “untouchables” in our daily lives, we seem to forget they exist at all.
The caste system is quite complex. Eminent sociologist Vivek Kumar, who specialises in Dalit studies, clarifies that sub-castes exist within the Bhangi community. The community, which is categorised as a Scheduled Caste, is known by different names across the country. For example, in Punjab, they are called Chuhras.
Akshay Kapoor, the 25-year-old frontman of ‘Bhangijumping’, told The Quint that he was clueless about the origin of the term “Bhangi”, and that he did not know that it was a caste slur.
Kapoor also claimed that his music has nothing to do with caste. He told The Quint that his songs were personal and that some of them dealt with themes like mental illness.
The Piano Man Jazz Club (TPM) was criticised for being complicit in this act of casteism – albeit an unintentional one, as has been claimed by both Kapoor and Gupta. “The bands or artistes that are to perform at TPM are not chosen by me, to avoid my personal music preferences coming into play during selection. I have a dedicated team that picks the musicians based on their music,” TPM proprietor Arjun Sagar Gupta said.
After the event sparked outcry online, Gupta issued a clarification of sorts. His response was slammed for being insensitive and served to make the “boycott TPM” calls grow louder.
Gupta told The Quint that he regretted his first online clarification.
Acknowledging his first clarification as “insensitive,” Gupta admitted that it stemmed largely from ignorance. "I didn’t intend to club my thoughts about artistic freedom with that of the offensive name of the band,” he said.
Recognising the issue as a serious one, Gupta said he and his team intended to create a forum for people to understand caste, while keeping their privilege in check.
Sebanti Chatterjee, a PhD student at the Delhi School of Economics’ Department of Sociology, visited the jazz club after the social media protests began, in an effort to start a dialogue with Gupta.
In an email to The Quint, Chatterjee expressed surprise at the fact that until this incident, no one had bothered to tell the band that they had an offensive name. “The fact that TPM was hosting them shows ignorance on their part. The matter came to my notice when fragments of a conversation appeared on my news feed. A few friends decided to visit the club to request them to not host the band; I joined them,” she said.
“Upon our arrival, we learnt that Arjun had already changed the name of the band when the artiste couldn’t justify why he chose the name in the first place,” Chatterjee said.
“The first clarification on TPM’s part came across as weakly worded, but the second seemed genuine and apologetic,” Chatterjee said. The scholar also added:
Some did not buy Gupta’s narrative and demanded that the club be shut down and that legal action be taken against him. In an email to The Quint, 24-year-old Raya Sarkar, a Singapore-based lawyer who participated in the online protest, said that those involved in the alleged act of casteism should be brought to book and penalised under The Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
“The biggest problem is that they have done criminal acts and can be penalised by statute and that people are being abused for wanting to uphold the law,” she said.
Professor Vivek Kumar begs to differ. “While ignorance is no excuse, one thing is for sure, we should give them (the accused) the benefit of doubt. Going by TPM’s arguments, it seems that they genuinely are clueless, which exposes how unaware many people are of caste slurs,” he said.
“Many a time, we live in our own worlds and can’t seem to look beyond it,” he said, as he lashed out at those who joined the online protest without understanding the issue. “Dalits are raped, assaulted and discriminated against everyday. What legal action has been taken against the several lynchings that have taken place? So why crucify these musicians?” Kumar asked.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)