advertisement
Around 8:30 every morning, hundreds of workers arrive at the main bus depot in Noida Phase II, about 30 km from New Delhi. They fan out into the lanes of the neighbouring Hosiery Complex. With nothing more than a tiffin box in their hands, they begin their daily job hunt.
Almost every factory gate has a board proclaiming 'Avashyakta hai (wanted)'. It lists the categories of daily-wagers required – tailors, ‘pressmen’ (as those employed for ironing are called), packers and so on – by the 200 small, export-driven garment units in the complex. But the boards have been blank since the factories were hit by the aftermath of demonetisation.
These men and women are among the 92% of India’s workforce employed in the informal sector. This sector generates about half of the country’s gross domestic product, according to the National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganized Sector. Casual workers enjoy no job security or benefits of labour regulations, and about 79% of them live below the poverty line.
Losing even a day’s work, at the minimum wage of Rs 350, is not an option for workers like Chanchala Devi, 35, a native of Nalanda in Bihar. Devi is a tailor, and has been trudging up and down 2 km for an hour and she has been turned away at every gate. The first shift has begun and gates have shut at 9.30 am. But she is reluctant to return home.
For the textile and apparel industry, November to January is peak season, a time when factories normally send out vehicles to pick seasoned workers like Devi off the streets. In these three months, garment factories produce merchandise for the spring-summer lines of fashion houses in the West.
Workers like Devi are paid every fortnight – either as dehadi (daily wage), which is Rs 350 in Noida, or on piece-rate basis. Two cycles of fortnightly payment have gone past since 8 November, and the units and workers managed to tide over the cash crunch–mostly by using old currency notes. But now, there is anxiety about where the factories are going to find the cash to pay these workers.
Nandan worked in one of the most stable units in the complex. Just last week, the factory shut down two assembly lines – each ‘line’ usually employs between 25 and 45 workers.
A small to mid-scale entrepreneur, who did not wish to be named, said in an average November-December, he would have at least 1,500 workers at his factory; of them, 75% temporary. He has, post demonetisation, cut the numbers down to 500.
“We are in wait-and-watch mode, but if the liquidity crunch remains, we will downsize further. And others (in the field) are saying that too,” he said. On the shopfloor, there are lines where sewing machines sit unmanned, huge piles of cloth waiting to be stitched.
“Productivity has taken a huge hit and if a single link in the assembly line drops, the whole process collapses,” he added.
He has managed to hang on to his job, but has lost daily wages for four days, queuing up at banks to exchange old notes.
Like Nandan and Javid, most workers in this complex are migrants, unskilled or partially skilled. Almost all of them come from the impoverished districts of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, mostly men who leave their families behind. They live in the rural islands that still dot an area being swallowed by high-rise housing estates.
Labour activists have, for a long time, been criticising the high levels of informalisation or casualisation of the workforce in the garments industry.
But small-scale employers insisted that in a seasonal industry with fluctuating demand conditions, this works ideally. “These migrant workers look for seasonal employment and return to their villages in dull months. They are not interested in permanent employment and they prefer nakad (cash),” a factory owner said. “They don’t want salaries in banks, or the headache of ESI (employees’ state insurance) or PF (provident fund) cuts.”
He added that if employers add the cost of permanent staffing to their costs, they will have to raise their prices and thus lose the competitive edge in the world market. Workers say they prefer the flexibility the arrangement offers, the freedom to look for the best-paying employer in the market and the scope for overtime at any given point of time.
The next month will be critical for the industry and if the cash scarcity continues, workers like Devi and Javid may have no option but to return home.
(This article has been published in an arrangement with IndiaSpend. Nair is a consulting editor with IndiaSpend.)
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)