advertisement
In a recent order, the CIC, M Sridhar Acharyulu, pulled up CPIO Meenakshi Sahay of Delhi University and said the rejections reminded him of the saying “penny wise, pound foolish”.
The commission, directing the “public authority” to recover an amount of Rs 25,000 from the salary payable to Sahay, said that after hearing the story that thousands of rupees had been spent in a legal battle over a postal order of Rs 10, “the proverb ‘penny wise, pound foolish' has to be rewritten as ‘rupee wise and thousand foolish’”.
In her defence, Sahay argued that there was no malice in rejecting the RTI application and that she had to follow the policies laid down by the University.
The commission did not find any merit or justification in her argument, stating that the fee was not a material factor to throw out an RTI request.
It said it was “vexed with non-response” from the CPIO to a number of its notices and thus found it a fit case to impose penalty.
Calling the CPIO's action “pathetic”, the commissioner said in the order that “such a simple request for information has been dragged to the level of second appeal, building heaps of documents with multiple files”.
The commission also slammed Delhi University for “spending huge amounts of money and consuming precious time of public servants”, including the commission.
It also asked the “public authority”, without defining it, to facilitate sufficient training to the entire staff, including the CPIO, in the matter of RTI law so that they do not reject applications in a routine manner without applying any thought process into it.
The commission recommended that officials be provided with the latest books on the RTI Act as well as classic text books on administrative law.
It suggested they should also be given the books Right to Know by late professor SP Sathe and Five-point Someone: What Not To Do At IIT by Chetan Bhagat.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)