'You Cannot Buy Justice': Muzaffarnagar Riot Rape Survivor's Unbreakable Resolve

"The rape survivor is not agreeing to compromise, so what can we do," the brother of the rape accused said. 

(Photo: Debayan Dutta/The Quint)

After the 2013 Muzaffarnagar communal riots seven women alleged they were raped. Of the seven allegations, only six materialised into FIRs filed with the UP police. One woman withdrew her case because the accused allegedly threatened to kill her son, while the villagers claimed she had taken money and settled. Six women were left.

Five years later, by 2018, five of the six women changed their statement in court. The Quint had exposed how in the midst of a delayed judicial process that was replete with threats, pressure and bribes, these five women told the court that the men they themselves named in their complaints had never raped them.

As a result, 22 rape accused got off the hook in the name of 'societal harmony'.

Eight years later, in 2021, only one woman's case against three rape accused continues in court.

This is her story.

How One September 2013 Night Changed Everything

"Till when can we keep running away from these people? Till when can we keep being scared of them? I wish all the women had fought the cases together and supported each other. The accused would have surely been punished at some point or the other. As I got to know they all settled one after the other, I kept a distance," 32-year-old Aafreen (name changed to protect identity) tells this reporter as we sit to speak in her home in UP's Shamli district.

Her home adorns grey walls, the kitchen is poorly lit and the bathroom does not have a door. But things were not always like this, she says.

Aafreen's first marriage was an abusive one, with a man who beat her up for not bearing children. Frustrated, he had given her a divorce. After that she met Amaan and had married him five years before the riots.

They built a life for themselves in Shamli district's Lank village. Their home had two rooms, a hall and relatives who lived close by. She worked as a tailor at home, while Amaan* (name changed) had a shop in the village. Soon she had two sons. But these years of bliss came to an end with the shocking turn of events of September 2013.

This is Kawaal village, where the riots of 2013 were sparked from.

(Photo: Aishwarya S Iyer/The Quint)

Sixty kilometers away in Kawal village in neighbouring Muzaffarnagar district, violence had begun to spread after the killing of Shahnawaz by Gaurav and Sachin who were soon after caught by a mob and killed too. This sparked one of the most bloody riots of north India in 2013, where over 60,000 were displaced, 62 killed and many continue to be missing. Engulfed in the violence were several villages, Aafreen's village was one of them.

While she was on the run to save her life, from the side of the fields in the village, she was caught and allegedly raped by three men who she named and could identify. They were Kuldeep, Sikander and Maheshvir who lived in her village.

After the 2013 riots, the Supreme Court had said the rape cases would be heard in fast track courts. Despite that, it took six years for the trial to begin in Aafreen's case. In its eight year now, she tells us the statement of the last witness is being recorded.

'Justice Will Be Seeing Them Being Punished'

Aafreen tells us how she has been ridiculed, discredited and defamed, while her husband was harmed physically and threatened repeatedly. Applications had to be filed in court and she was provided security.

"They even reached my home. They defamed me by talking to people who live close to my home. They sought help from them to strike a compromise with me by convincing them they had not done anything with me. We were threatened and told we must compromise or we will be killed," Aafreen says.

Aafreen lives a lonely life. She keeps mainly to her sons and relatives.

(Photo: Aishwarya S Iyer/The Quint)

In the face of this relentless barrage of intimidation, her strength to keep up against bribes, threats and pressure has remained unchanged. She has accustomed herself to a lonely life, spending most of her time with her children, husband and relatives. It is because of everything she has been through, that Aafreen is impatient to see the accused being punished. She wants all the duress she has been put through to culminate into seeing the accused behind bars. "That will be a sweet and good day for me. To see them punished. To see justice work," she says with a smile.

Aafreen does not believe money can buy justice. "The others have taken money and they say they got justice, like this anyone could do anything, give away money and call it justice. I do not agree with this. Justice can't be bought," she said.

When asked what she means by justice, she says it means the court pronouncing these men are truly criminals, that they are rape accused and must languish in jail.

Rape Accused Reluctantly Accept Aafreen Won't Settle

But the accused, functioning out of self interest, have made repeated attempts to avert the judicial process to save themselves. They were especially emboldened by how the other cases of rape had fallen flat and have a brewing bitterness about their case not going the 'faisla' way.

In several reports about Aafreen's case, the relatives of the accused who are Kuldeep, Maheshvir and Sikander have confirmed to this reporter that they have made attempts to compromise. Right before the trial was to begin in 2019, the relatives of the accused reached Aafreen's home.

This reporter spoke to two of the three who went. Tejpal Singh and Malkhan Singh, who are 'zimmedaar' (responsible) elders from the village had had gone to meet Aafreen with the intention of settling the matter out of court. “We know that the cases from Fugana village had reached a compromise. So we thought even ours could be dealt with. The issue would end. From a societal perspective, we went there so that the issue gets resolved,” Singh had told this reporter.

Unable to influence her, they reached out to witnesses in the case.

Aafreen's lawyers submitted in court that two people related to the case had been approached and pressurised, while also being asked to convince Aafreen's husband Amaan (name changed) to reach a compromise.

Arun Malik made effort after effort to get his brother, Sikander, off the hook. But, in the end, he failed.

(Photo: Aishwarya S Iyer/The Quint)

An upset brother of Sikander, who was the third person who had accompanied Tejpal and Malkhan, grudgingly tells this reporter how he did not know what to do anymore. Without a worry of disclosing what he is on camera, 30-year-old Arun Malik tells this reporter, "The case against my brother is going on. The rape survivor is not agreeing to compromise, so what can we do." How openly he speaks of settling out of court reflects how rampant this form of 'justice' was after the 2013 riots.

He goes on to detail how not only him, but even the other rape accused relatives had tried to compromise. "But now what do we do? The trial is ending. The statement of the police officer who was the investigating officer then is being recorded right now, only that is left," Malik said.

Kuldeep, who was one of the accused, died of a bad liver and heart attack. He was an alcoholic. "It was the tension from the case that made him drink," his brother Pradeep says on camera.

This is Kuldeep's brother and their mother. She swears that her son did no wrong and the woman is a liar.

(Photo: Aishwarya S Iyer/The Quint)

Years of trying have got them no where. They have finally realised, even if temporarily, that Aafreen will not give up. The realisation that the window to settle has passed has settled in.

But that does not keep any of them from ridiculing Aafreen for hours. She had registered her case of rape months after the incident. "She did this only after Akhilesh Yadav (then UP CM) had announced Rs 5 lakh compensation for rape victims. She did this for the money only," he said.

'Want to Move to a Place Where Can Live Peacefully'

Aafreen continues to not be able to peacefully sleep at night.

"I feel uneasy. I have not been able to forget that incident," she says. A few seconds later she requests her two sons to go to the terrace for a bit. After they are out of sight, she says, "I am reminded of how they caught me and dishonoured me. They came and forced themselves on me. This is why I keep getting tensed. Above that, the fact that my case continues to languish in court really bothers me."

As her sons play upstairs and we hear the sound of something fall, she says, "I also feel hurt by the thought that once my kids know what will they say to me? What will they think of me?"

She wants to relocate to a place where she is not defamed, where she can send her sons to school and where she can lead a normal life. A few years ago her old home in Lank village was sold off. This reporter met the buyer at the village. 40-year-old Sanjeev Kumar has already started breaking the old home down and building a new one in its place. Asked if he ever feels weird about living in the home of someone who was rendered homeless during the riots of 2013, he said, "Why should I feel weird? There is no reason to feel weird," he laughs and says that his family needs more space to live.

Standing with his hands on his hips is Sanjeev Kumar. A resident of the village who bought the home Aafreen used to live in.

(Photo: Aishwarya S Iyer/The Quint)

Aafreen and her relatives who lived next to her, were paid money. She is unaware that her home is on the verge of being reconstructed.

"We got some money, not too much. I never wanted to go back there anyway. When the people have come to our home to threaten us, if we even think of going back, they many not care, but they will not let us stay alive. They have come right up to our homes to threaten us, so we don't only want to go back home but we even avoid that area," she says.

After the 2013 Muzaffarnagar communal violence, the Supreme Court had said the rape cases would be heard in fast track courts. Despite that, it took six years for the trial to begin in Aafreen's case.

After Aafreen's alleged rape in the September of 2013, the FIR was registered in February 2014, following intervention of the Supreme Court. The charge sheet was filed by the end of 2014 and the case was committed to the sessions court in January 2015 – all of which took two years. While the trial began in 2019, COVID delayed the hearings. The Quint had gone to ground zero and reported on her trial that began after six years in 2019.