advertisement
“This verdict will send out a positive message about the judiciary not only in India, but even internationally – the message that minorities are safe here.”
Too caught up to read? Listen to the full story here.
Mubeen Farooqui, the 34-year-old private counsel for the the Kathua rape-murder victim’s adoptive father Yunus*, appears self-assured and calm a day after the Pathankot trial court convicted six of the seven men accused in the case.
“But we will move the Chandigarh High Court to appeal against the acquittal of the accused. The paperwork for this has already begun,” he adds calmly.
In March-April of 2018, he had approached Yunus, Aafreen*’s adoptive father and the complainant on the case. “During that time, Supreme Court lawyer Indira Jaising had moved the motion of shifting the case out of Jammu. I expressed interest in being the private counsel if the case moved to Punjab,” he says.
It was through Farooqui that Deepika Rajawat was given power of attorney in the case in Pathankot. However, within six months she was bumped off the case by Yunus. “Due to Rajawat repeatedly bringing up her safety, her daughter’s future and the two-hour travel between Jammu and Pathankot, they thought best she was not attached to the case,” he said. While this ended her legal association with the case it only solidified Farooqui’s.
His family was worried though, as he had to travel around 250 kilometers one way from his home in Malerkotla to reach Pathankot.
His two daughters – a three-and-a-half-year-old and another nine years old – wife and parents would regularly tell him they were concerned about his safety. “Yeah, they would hint at the need of me having taken up this case. However, it is my job to defend. If we all start being scared, don’t do our jobs or get out of home, how will the world work?”
“Santok Singh Basra and Jagdishwar Chopra were the Special Public Prosecutors and Harminder Singh and Rupinder Singh from the Jammu and Kashmir crime branch, all of them deserve to be lauded. To get all facts on record, to get all witnesses to come and testify in court, a lot of hard work has gone in,” he says.
Farooqui says the transfer of case from Jammu to Pathankot was needed for the trial to continue being an unbiased one. “The transfer was a great decision because of which we feel, Satyamev Jayate (truth will triumph), which is the soul of our Constitution, has won.”
Farooqui says when you are in a high-profile case then threats and intimidation are a part of the job, adding that he never wanted to bring those issues to the limelight. “I can speak now as the verdict and sentencing is over but in January five months ago when I left the court premises after proceedings, someone threw a stone at my car from the front side. I was driving alone.”
Narrating another recent incident, he says while he was trying to cross the road right outside the Pathankot trial court on the day when final arguments were presented, he recalls, "kissi ne mere uper bakaida gaadi chalane ki koshish ki thi (Someone definitely tried to run their car over me).
His family has known of these threats over the last year but have not succeeded in keeping him from attending the hearings. “Every time a private witness needs to testify, I have ensured I am there. When I left home the morning the verdict was to be delivered, my mother, as a joke of course, said she will give me a gift of Rs 5,000 if I bring a favourable outcome in the case,” he says laughing.
Later when The Quint called to check whether his mother delivered on her word after hearing of the convictions, a smiling Farooqui said, “Yes, yes, very much, she was standing right outside the house when I went. With an envelope in her hand she gave me the money. I don’t know what I am going to do with it yet, still deciding.”
(*Names changed to protect identity)
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)