advertisement
“These organisers told me exactly what to say at the gate when I enter the campus. I was given a different name and reason for coming. Why should I do it? Why can’t I enter the way I want? What kind of freedom is this?” a visibly agitated Bezwada Wilson asked, standing at what is known as Azaadi Chowk (Freedom Square) in New Delhi. The irony did not go unnoticed.
The Magsaysay awardee spoke at the Jawaharlal Nehru University during its five-day lecture series on Wednesday, an illustrious campus that has now come to be known for harbouring desh-drohis.
The months that followed witnessed an unprecedented student uprising at JNU, asking uncomfortable questions and challenging the establishment.
The JNU administration’s next step was predictable – efforts to curtail dissent. It ruled that protests, dharnas and hunger strikes could only be held "at a distance of 20 metres away from administration and academic complexes”. With this diktat, the famous (and symbolic) ‘Freedom Square’ was declared out of bounds for protests.
It was not only Bezwada Wilson, then, who was left unsettled with abrupt changes in the basic ideology of the university and the looming panopticon that was suddenly in order. As somebody who has visited the university on multiple occasions earlier, these changes were both symbolic and disturbing.
The Quint had first-hand experience of this surveillance during one of its shoots.
Accosted with these regressive changes, one question remains – what was it that made Hamlet’s Denmark such a rotten place?
Within the last one week, at least five teachers have been sent notices by the administration asking them to “follow the rules” of the university and not address students at the Administrative Block.
One of the receivers is Professor Nivedita Menon.
In the wake of the spate of notices being sent to the faculty, JNU Teachers’ Association (JNUTA) on Tuesday observed a one-day strike. Menon on Friday told The Quint that the teachers who participated in the strike will lose one day’s salary.
“They are now deploying all these new mechanisms to stop us. Recently, a group of students were suspended by the university for disrupting a session of the Academic Council. This was done pending inquiry,” Umar Khalid told The Quint. Khalid is one of the JNU students who, along with Kanhaiya Kumar, was arrested in February for raising “anti-national” slogans in the campus.
Aren’t these decisions arbitrary then? “Arbitrary is only an understatement,” Khalid said. “Despite what they do, we will continue to protest. The lecture-series is a part of this protest”
“Azaadi chowk humaara hai (Azaadi chowk is ours)” is what the pamphlet introducing JNUTA’s lecture series reads.
Apart from lectures, Wednesday also witnessed the freedom square come alive in the form of a street play aimed at satirising the administration’s growing authoritarian tyranny. “We are fighting against every measure that is being instituted in the campus,” a student performing in the play told The Quint.
“The new face of the JNU administration is now in an open war with teachers and students to destroy everything that the institution has been known for. The most recent suspension of students is part of this culture the administration has now put in place – the repeated threat of disciplinary action for everything, so no one can dare to question them,” Ranjani Mazumdar, professor in the School of Arts and Aesthetics, JNU wrote in The Wire.
Do Mazumdar’s words, then, become the chronicle of a university’s death foretold, or will the full-throated growls of its students keep its fabric from unraveling?
(With inputs from Shorbori Purkayastha.)
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)