advertisement
Amid looming protests in India and across the world over the controversial Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), top international media houses have expressed their opinions over the Act and the ongoing protests. The Washington Posts calls the ongoing protests a potential tipping point towards authoritarianism, and The Guardian calls citizenship law “dangerous for all”.
Here are some excerpts from opinion pieces published across top international media houses:
The Guardian’s Editorial team focuses on the national reaction to CAA and writes that ”...Mr Modi’s Hindu nationalist project is not a containable anomaly, but an enterprise that threatens the nation’s very foundations of pluralism and secularism.”
The Washington Post article starts with a first person account from the writer, highlighting moments in a protest like : “A woman standing next to me searched Google for the preamble and started reading along.”
The SCMP article gives an overview of the ongoing protests, with a look-back at the history of immigration from Bangladesh. The author, who writes about the potential repercussions of the bill on the illegal immigrants already living in India, states that “while Bangladesh’s foreign minister has asked India for a list of illegal immigrants from his country and says Bangladesh will allow them to return, their future remains as bleak and uncertain as that of the Rohingya Muslims."
The BBC provided an overlook on the protests, with segments focusing on its background and reason. With support of pictures and graphics, the article portrays the essential elements of the entire protest and the controversial Citizenship Amendment Act.
The New York Times editorial analyses the CAA and the ongoing protests. The editorial board writes, “..the reaction to the citizenship law has apparently surprised Mr. Modi, who was re-elected by a comfortable margin last May, but he has shown no signs of backing down.”
In TIME's editorial on 20 December, Ian Bremmer wrote that he used to argue Prime Minister Narendra Modi embodied India's best chance at much-needed economic reform, but the recent developments have changed his views.
He pointed out how the latest legislation – the Citizenship Amendment Act, (CAA) – and National Register of Citizens (NRC) are harmful for the country's democracy amid the current complex economic situation.
“India, and Modi in particular, had a window of opportunity to take the bold decisions needed to remake India’s economy competitive for the 21st century. They’re now closing that window, and India is poised to fall even further.”
Financial Times' editorial drew parallels between the 1975 Emergency and the current situation, adding that Prime Minister Narendra Modi should reverse his position before it is too late.
Talking about the protests against Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), the piece read, “The demonstrations show that Indian citizens do care about secularism, despite the attempts of Mr Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party’s attempts to denigrate it. The citizenship law is only one manifestation of its Hindu nationalism.”
The article concluded with the fact that in 1977, as Indira Gandhi faced defeat, 40 years later, PM Modi “should turn back from the path of illiberal democracy before it is too late.”
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)