‘Waterman of India’ Will Not Support Sadhguru’s ‘Rally for Rivers’

“This Rally for Rivers is not for rivers. It is for the land, money, power, fame and name,” says Rajendra Singh.

File photos of activist Rajendra Singh, and Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev. 

(Photo courtesy: The News Minute)

"I have rejuvenated nine rivers in my lifetime. I haven't seen any of them rejuvenate with a missed call," said Rajendra Singh, a well-known water activist, criticising Isha Foundation's 'Rally for Rivers' campaign.

Singh, who is also known as the 'Waterman of India', was referring to the campaign's call to support the cause by giving a missed call on 80009 80009. Led by Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev, Rally for Rivers is an ambitious project which aims to revive the country's rivers.

Singh’s scathing comments come a few months after he appeared in a video for the foundation, seemingly lending his support to the campaign.

Now, Singh reveals what he told Sadhguru and his team when he met them, and how it apparently fell on deaf ears.

In Coimbatore for the Bharathappuzha river rejuvenation convention, Singh told media persons categorically that he would never support ‘Rally for Rivers.’

What Rajendra Told Sadhguru and His Team

Singh alleged that when he met Jaggi and his team, though he doesn’t specify when, he tried to explain to them the role of a godman in rejuvenating rivers. In his opinion, a godman should hold a moral compass for the government as well as the people when they start exploiting and destroying rivers.

I also told them that if we have a river policy, it needs to be about making India drought and flood-free. I told them that this cannot be done by linking rivers. We should link minds and hearts of Indian people with rivers instead.  I also said, if the baba can link people with rivers, they can be rejuvenated. Not by anything else.

Rajendra Singh, ‘Waterman of India’

Singh also expressed his views about the futility of a missed call campaign, tree plantation, and interlinking in reviving and rejuvenating Indian rivers.

We need to make the flow of the river slower, and not use dams to stop it altogether. Once it’s slowed, it prevents erosion in the upper riparian areas, and silting in lower ones. Stopping erosion and silting is what rejuvenates rivers and gets it flowing again, not tree plantation.

Rajendra Singh

Singh alleges that he told all these things clearly to Sadhguru and his team.

Nothing will happen with missed calls and slogans to revive rivers, I told him (Sadhguru) strictly. But Baba is Baba. Baba will revive river with missed call. I can tell you today, I have never been a supporter of rally of rivers.

Rajendra Singh

The Video and Misrepresentation of Views

That Singh is a staunch critic of interlinking rivers is well known. The video that Isha Foundation put out in September this year, however, seemed to imply that he had changed his position. Soon after the video was published, the water conservationist told Nityanand Jayaraman for The Wire that his views had been misrepresented.

He had heard that the campaign's call to people to save rivers was being received positively, following which he decided to support the initiative.

Though he did mention that the central government was planning to interlink rivers, his views against such a project had been edited out, he stated.

In my interview, I said that interlinking of rivers is highly dangerous. It will not join India. It will not make India. It will break India. I had said that it will not protect us either from drought or floods, and that the project will only escalate conflict within the country.

Rajendra Singh

Calling the assumptions baseless, a volunteer for Isha Foundation said the video had not been edited.

While the foundation has not openly voiced its support for river interlinking, a project questioned by many experts, it has spoken about revitalising rivers through measures which, while different from river interlinking, do not specifically rule it out.

The ‘Rally for Rivers’ initiative is about revitalising rivers and augmenting the flow of water in them. This focus on actually augmenting water supply is therefore qualitatively different from other measures, including river linking, that seek to utilise the currently available water supply.

Sadguru in a <a href="http://isha.sadhguru.org/blog/sadhguru/masters-words/can-trees-save-rivers/">blog</a>

The Politician-God men Nexus

Hitting back at Rally for Rivers further, Singh then argued, “I can say this now after three months – this ‘Rally for Rivers’, is not for rivers. It is for the land, for money, for power, for fame, and for name. What can they get out of this rally – that’s what this is about.”

Singh talked about the nexus between godmen and politicians and how it was dangerous.

“When politicians want to get votes by showcasing the issue of rivers, they push the babas in front. And when the baba feels threatened of being sent to jail for taking over 45 acres of tribals’ land – then he chases the politicians, asking them for protection,” he alleged.

Pointing out how four godmen had been brought to book in the last two years (Jagat Guru Rampal, Ram Rahim, Falahari Baba and Asaram Bapu), Singh appealed, “When godmen are afraid of going to prison and politicians are greedy for votes, such a nexus is born, and it is dangerous. Don’t let this nexus be formed in the name of rivers. It will prove to be dangerous for the country.”

(This article has been published in an arrangement with The News Minute.)