HC Asks DU to Go Easy on Student Leaders, Hinting at Jaitley

Asking the college authorities not to be too harsh on student leaders, the court obliquely referenced Arun Jaitley.

File photo of the Delhi High Court.

(Photo: IANS)

Former Union Minister Arun Jaitley, who passed away on Saturday, 24 August, got an oblique mention in the Delhi High Court on Monday, 26 August. The HC, responding to a matter of defacement of public property during the DUSU polls in 2017, said university authorities should not be too harsh on student leaders for activities during student union elections, since some go on to become great leaders.

In apparent reference to Jaitley, the bench said:

“Don’t be too harsh on them. Don’t put ban on everything. From student leaders, we sometime get great leaders for the country. You know the examples, you must have seen it yesterday.”

Bench of Chief Justice DN Patel & Justice C Hari Shankar

It stated this in its oral observations soon after dictating its order directing authorities to initiate civil and criminal action against candidates of Delhi University Students Union (DUSU) polls responsible for defacing property, and said that such things do happen during polls.

Jaitley was an Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) student activist at Delhi University in the 1970s and became President of the University Students Union in 1974.

The BJP stalwart died on 24 August at the All India Medical Institute of Sciences (AIIMS) where he was undergoing treatment following multiple ailments. His mortal remains were cremated on 25 August with thousands of admirers, BJP workers and leaders from across the political spectrum paying tribute.

‘Students to Be Warned About the Court Orders’

The court passed directions and disposed of a PIL by lawyer Prashant Manchanda, seeking a complete ban on defacement of public properties by the DUSU poll candidates.

While dictating its order, it asked the authorities to inform student leaders and union about the guidelines framed for regulating election campaigning for the student body polls to prevent defacement in future.

The bench said that the students should be warned about the orders passed by the court and thereafter, civil and criminal action should be initiated against those involved in damaging public or private properties, as per law.

The petitioner had earlier placed before the court a ‘status report’ giving the names of 15 persons who were involved in destruction of public and private property through use of spray paints and other means of defacement during the process of DUSU election in 2017.

The court asked the Centre, the university and the police to keep in mind the last year's direction to ensure there was no defacement of public property during the DUSU elections and said wide publicity should be given to penal consequences of such actions.

The high court had earlier said prevention of defacement of property during student body polls in the DU was more important than taking action against candidates after they indulge in such activity.

The court had suggested putting in place deterrents like disqualification of candidates to prevent defacement of property during the student body polls.

It had also issued directions to the municipal corporations to be "vigilant" and remove any temporary hoarding or banner put up illegally without due caution and also take penal action, as such structures could result in harm to someone's life.