advertisement
Supreme Court judge Rohinton F Nariman recently delivered a lecture titled ‘Great Contemporaries: Akbar, Suleiman I and Elizabeth I’, in New Delhi on 14 January, which was excerpted by the Indian Express. In it, he tried to draw parallels of the three rulers with present day dignity of individuals and unity of the nation.
Nariman talked about the philosopher-king, a concept that was given by Plato in his Book 6 of Republic.
He took the example of three contemporaries because their rule coincided. Suleiman ruled from 1520 to 1566. Akbar’s rule started in 1565, and ended in 1605, and Elizabeth’s rule was co-terminus, almost exactly with Akbar’s, ending in 1603.
Akbar built the Buland Darwaza at Fatehpur Sikri, the forts to commemorate his conquests but Nariman said that the objective was to not be a thief and run away with the country’s wealth.
His great Ibadaar Khana was the first council of world religions, Nariman said.
He had great respect for Zoroastrianism and it was because he was greatly taken by a Sufi saint that he decided to formulate his own religion, said Nariman.
Suleiman was a loved leader but a great ‘blot’ in his career as Nariman called it, was his marriage to Roxalena.
In one of her last speeches to the Parliament Elizabeth I said:
To Nariman, the virtues of other sects need to be praised by the one in power to be able to increase the influence of one’s own sect and make the others learn.
He says that the rallying cry of the French Revolution was ‘Liberty, Fraternity and Equality’, all of which are in the Indian Preamble but much isn’t said about fraternity.
He ends by calling it a value of cardinal importance.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)