advertisement
Citing lack of evidence, a special CBI court on Wednesday 21 February, discharged former Gujarat DGP PP Pandey in the 2004 alleged fake encounter case of Ishrat Jahan and three others.
The court also held that permission to prosecute Pandey, who was a government servant, was not taken by the investigating officer from the state before filing of the charge sheet against him, though it was required under section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
The Gujarat police had claimed that Ishrat and the others had links with Pakistan-based terror outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and had plotted to kill then Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi.
The CBI, which investigated the case, had accused Pandey, who then headed the Ahmedabad crime branch, of being involved in the alleged fake encounter.
In the first week of February this year, a special CBI court concluded the hearing on a discharge application filed by Pandey, who had contended that the statements of two witnesses against him were contradictory and that none of the other 105 witnesses examined by the court had named him.
Ishrat Jahan's mother Shamima Kauser, and Javed Sheikh alias Pranesh Pillai's father, Gopinath Pillai, were made respondents by the court in the matter, on their request. Both opposed Pandey's application, saying if he was discharged, it would obstruct the investigation.
Pandey was taken back into service in February 2015, after being released on bail and was appointed the Director of the state's Anti Corruption Bureau. On 16 April last year, Pandey was appointed the in-charge DGP of Gujarat. He resigned later that month after his appointment was challenged in the Supreme Court.
Expressing her disappointment over the discharge of PP Pandey, advocate Vrinda Grover said that “the pattern of impunity begins with the discharge of the most senior accused.”
(With inputs from PTI)
(This story has been updated to reflect the reactions to the court order)
(The Quint, in association with BitGiving, has launched a crowdfunding campaign for an 8-month-old who was raped in Delhi on 28 January 2018. The baby girl, who we will refer to as 'Chhutki', was allegedly raped by her 28-year-old cousin when her parents were away. She has been discharged from AIIMS hospital after undergoing three surgeries, but needs more medical treatment in order to heal completely. Her parents hail from a low-income group and have stopped going to work so that they can take care of the baby. You can help cover Chhutki's medical expenses and secure her future. Every little bit counts. Click here to donate.)
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)