advertisement
As the debate intensifies over the impending release of the juvenile convict in the December 2012 gangrape case, The Quint continues its investigations into the Observation Home and the Juvenile Justice Board.
On 31 October, we reported the authorities’ concerns that the juvenile convict has shown no remorse for his act. We now learn that he’s fearful of leaving the Observation Home. However, he’s not keen to be lodged at an NGO either.
Indian laws do not allow for juvenile convicts to be kept behind bars. But questions remain on what’s next for this man (he is no longer a minor). Can he lead a normal life?
A few weeks ago, his lawyer wrote a letter to the Ministry of Home Affairs requesting them to arrange for him to conceal his identity.
The Juvenile Justice Board has not yet taken any decision whether or not the juvenile convict should be housed in ‘After Care’. Sources say that Observation Homes do not have the facility to train inmates in skill development. As a result, many juvenile inmates after the release are not left with much choice to earn a living. Some are also forced to take the path of crime.
Meanwhile, the juvenile convict’s mother, who is worried about his safety, wants to take him back to their native village.
Amod Kanth, who runs the Prayas Juvenile Aid Centre, says that he organises several development workshops. He adds that these workshops could help the juvenile convict in securing a job.
Sources tell The Quint that the centre and the state government are trying to find a way out to detain the juvenile convict at an NGO after his release from the Observation Home. But legal experts are clear that he cannot be forced to live anywhere.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)