advertisement
In a press release dated 7 August 2017, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) claimed that there has been a ‘substantial increase’ in the number of tax returns filed this year (1 April – 5 August 2017) on account of demonetisation.
These first sentences from the CBDT press release are important and we will put them under a microscopic scrutiny in the next few paragraphs.
– In 2015, the due date for filing tax returns was extended from 31 July to 7 September.
– ITR wise break-up of tax returns filed is available for 1.84 crore tax returns filed between 1 April – 31 August 2015. Between 1-7 September 2015, approximately 22 lakh tax returns were filed, for which ITR wise break up is not available.
The above figures reveal that for the period 1 April – 31 August 2016, the number of e-returns filed were 2.56 crores. This is a 24.3 percent jump from the number of tax returns e-filed for the same period previous year i.e. 1 April – 31 August 2015.
However, in FY 15-16, the due date for filing tax returns was extended till 7 September 2015. So to make the data comparable, we have considered the tax returns filed up to 7 September 2015 which is 2.06 crores.
So the first question that arises is – when there was a clear 24 percent jump in the number of tax returns filed between April – August 2016, is the government right in claiming that there has been a substantial rise in 2017?
While the comparative period we have taken for FYs 2012-16 is April – August, in 2017, we have data only up to 5 August. But it may not be out of place to assume that on 31 August 2017, the number of returns filed will still be 25 percent more than those filed in 2016.
Now lets dig even deeper into the statistics and take out from the calculations all the tax returns filed up to 31 August, but whose due date falls on 30 September. All Corporate assesses and those non-corporate taxpayers, whose receipts are above Rs 1 crore, have to get their accounts audited (tax audit ) and file income-tax returns by 30- 30 September.
For a moment, let us consider only those returns whose due-date falls on 31 July (all individual assessees (mainly salaried class) and non-corporate assessees whose receipts are below Rs. 1 crore). In this case, ITR 4, 5 & 6 which have filed from April 1 – August 31st, shall be excluded from the data. Now, in 2015, since the 31 July due date was extended till 7 September, we need to consider the ITR wise data as of 7 September 2015.
Unfortunately, the ITR wise data is available only as on 31 August 2015. Between 31 August and 7 September 2015 around 22 lakh tax returns in all were filed, but their ITR wise break up is not available. From April – August 2015, 1.84 crore tax returns were filed of which 16.4% returns were ITR 4, 5 & 6. Let us assume that of the 22 lakh returns filed between September 1 & 7, 2015, only 3 lakh (13.6%) were tax audit ones, i.e. ITR 4,5 & 6. Even after eliminating ITR 4, 5 & 6 from both 2015 and 2016, what we get is as follows :
Tax returns filed between 1 April – 7 September 2015 = 1.73 crores (2.06 crores tax returns – 33 lakhs ITR 4,5,6 )
Tax returns filed between 1 April – 31 August 2016 = 2.12 crores (2.57 crores tax returns – 45 lakhs ITR 4,5, 6).
Even eliminating ITRs 4, 5 & 6 from the equation still shows 22.5 percent growth in tax returns in 2016 vs 2015, for the relevant period April to August. This compares favourably to the 25 percent growth in tax returns this year as per the CBDT press release.
The second statistical assertion in the CBDT press release is also inaccurate. The CBDT claims in its press release of 7 August 2017 that the rise in percentage of tax returns this year is 25%, whereas for the same period in 2016, the percentage rise was only 9.9 percent. This is absolutely incorrect.
The CBDT has taken two completely different baselines for comparison. It has calculated the 9.9 percent increase figure based on the number of tax returns filed between 1 April – 5 August 2016, vs the number of tax returns filed between 1 April – 7 September 2015. Sure, the due date in 2015 was extended to 7 September, so rather the CBDT should have compared the number of returns filed between 1 April – 31 August 2016 vs 1 April – 7 September 2015.
That would produce comparable results for statistical analysis… and what does it show? A 24 percent rise in tax returns in 2016 vs 2015 and not 9.9 percent, as the 7 August press release of CBDT seeks to present. And as we have shown in the above para, in case we were to eliminate all the ITRs 4, 5 & 6 which were filed between April 1 and August 31 from both 2015 and 2016 data, we still get a 22 percentage increase in returns filed.
To prove our above point, we need to look no further than the CBDT’s own press release issued last year on 8 August 2016. These are sentences culled out as is from that press release.
The CBDT itself in its press release last year admitted that the periods are not comparable. Thankfully, the CBDT did not compare the no. of returns filed between 1 April – 5 August for both 2015 and 2016. Had they done that, not only would it be incomparable (since due date in 2015 was extended till 7 September), but would have shown a 200% rise in no. of tax returns filed in 2016! That would have been muddled the picture even more.
Now lets turn to another claim in the press release.
This one is a little more difficult to prove/disprove, for a simple reason that there isn’t comparable data available on the personal advance tax collections for April – 5 August 2016 or even for Q1 of 2016-17. At least we couldn’t find. But there is data available on personal income tax collections (self-assessment tax) for 2016, albeit for the period April – June 30, 2016.
The CBDT press release dated 8 July 2016 shows even last year in Q1, the gross personal income tax collection growth was around 30% while the growth in net collection (after adjusting for refunds) was 48.75%. So a 34.2% increase in personal tax collections this year, is par for the course and in line with the previous year’s growth percentages.
What adds to the confusion though is another press release issued by the CBDT (9 August), pertaining to tax collections for the period 1 April – 31 July 2017. As per the latest press release there has been only a 17.5% growth in gross personal tax collections between April – July this year. Whereas, the CBDT press release issued couple of days ago, (7 August) states that there has been a 34% growth in personal tax collections between 1 April and 5 August 2017. It seems the last 5 days before the due date for filing returns, i.e. 5 August produced a windfall for the Revenue.
Now to a point which is highly arguable. But this is actually to the credit of tax department. Rather than giving oversized credit to the 8 November demonetisation for the increase in tax collections, the CBDT ought to have patted its own back for their relentless pursuit of tax evaders. In July 2016 (4 months before demonetisation), while the Income Declaration Scheme (IDS) was still on, the CBDT first sent an internal memo to its Officers and then followed it up with a high impact press statement/release, that essentially upped the ante on those evading taxes. The crux of the July 2016 CBDT statement/internal directive :
To shower all credit in the lap of demonetisation, for the rise in number of tax returns/ increase in tax collections, is at one level, undermining the conscious efforts of the CBDT and IT Department, to track and bring tax evaders into the tax net. Demonetisation may have been a powerful, painful nail in the coffin for many a tax evaders, but not the only nail. To use a cliché, the jury is well and truly still out.
(This story has been authored by Arun Giri who is Group Editor of leading tax information portal, Taxsutra.com. The story was first published on Boom.)
(Love your mother tongue? This Independence Day, tell The Quint why and how you love your bhasha. You may even win a BOL t-shirt! Sing, write, perform, spew poetry – whatever you like – in your mother tongue. Send us your BOL at bol@thequint.com or WhatsApp it to 9910181818.)
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)