advertisement
When a second year undergraduate female student of Delhi’s prestigious St Stephen’s College was told she was not granted the college’s hostel facility for the next academic session, she was both shocked, and worried about what comes next.
“Not seeing my name on the (hostel) list was shocking. I’ve excelled in academics, have good attendance and actively participate in the college life. Still, others who were less deserving made it to the list. My parents are worried. They have a problem with me staying outside the college hostel,” she told The Quint.
In March this year, many students and teachers erupted in vehement protest after it emerged that the college was deciding to apply for autonomous status. They said the decision was taken without consulting them – the stakeholders.
John Varghese, principal of the college, had told the protesting teachers and students on 3 March that he would write to the governing body regarding holding of consultations. However, teachers allege that no proper consultations have taken place so far.
Autonomous status for the college would effectively mean that it would no longer come under the Delhi University, and could decide independently on matters such as syllabus, fees and branch expansion. Teachers have said that autonomy would lead to opaqueness in the admission procedure – with concerns being raised about a possible lack of accountability with regard to the cut-offs and reservations/quotas being implemented, as well as a manifold rise in the fees.
Another second year student, whose name wasn’t in the list, told The Quint that when he approached the college Dean asking why he had been excluded, he was told that along with merit as a criteria, the college was also considering ‘discipline’.
A press release signed by several St Stephen’s College students claims that the students’ protest against the autonomy demand, and the administration’s “autocratic functioning” are the real reasons behind the denial of hostel facility.
St Stephen’s conducts an annual interview process for first- and second-year students seeking the hostel facility. According to the college website, the criteria that are considered include “academic commitment”, place of residence (priority is given to “out-of-station” candidates) and “need of the candidate”.
However, the students claim that in the selection process this time, the only consideration has been whether they “toed the line of the college administration”.
Speaking to The Quint, Nandita Narain, a professor at the college, termed the move “completely unacceptable”.
As a protest, the students staged a mass boycott of the college mess, with the press release claiming that 360 out of 400 hostelers took part in the demonstration. The students pointed out that measures were taken to ensure food was not wasted.
However, as a second-year student pointed out, if the administration does not agree to take in more students into the hostel, it will inconvenience many.
The Quint is awaiting a response to an email and a message which were sent to the college principal, John Varghese, on the issue. The copy will be updated if we get a response from the college authorities.
(Students names have been withheld on request)
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)