advertisement
Five days after Delhi's Karkardooma court dismissed Delhi Police's review petition and asked it to register an FIR on the complaint of a Delhi riots victim, the cops did so on 30 August.
This is the second court order that directed the police to file an FIR on Saleem's complaint.
The FIR, which has been accessed by The Quint, was registered under Section 147 (rioting), 148 (rioting, armed with deadly weapon), 149 (unlawful assembly), 336 (rash or negligent act to endanger human life, personal safety) and 34 (common intention) of the IPC as well as Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Saleem is himself an accused in five Delhi riots cases. Initially he was named as an accused under FIR 66/2020 from the Delhi riots which has been registered under sections of rioting, rioting while being armed with deadly weapon, attempt to murder, house trespass and common intention. Then after he moved court for an FIR to be registered on his complaint, he claims the police slapped four other cases against him with similar charges. These are FIR 56/2020, FIR 72/2020, FIR 75/2020 and FIR 122/2020.
Saleem narrated how his home was attacked by locals, some of whom he knew by name, around 9:30 pm on 24 February.
The accused had allegedly pelted his house with stones and hurled petrol bombs at his roof.
The next morning, he and his three brothers packed and fled their home in fear.
Saleem wrote the complaint to the station house officer at Jafrabad police station on 1 March 2020 and also e-mailed the same complaint to the DCP of northeast Delhi thereafter. He requested the police keep him safe and investigate the matter.
After an the FIR was not being registered, Saleem moved court under Section 156/3 of the CrPC for registration of FIR on 18 March last year. Under this section one can move court to direct the police to register an FIR.
Between March and November 2020, the Metropolitan Magistrate heard the matter and asked the police to register an FIR on 23 November. It detailed how after the disclosure of the offence, an FIR had to be registered.
The police, however, challenged this court order through a review petition at ASJ Amitabh Rawat's court.
In the order from 25 August the court pulled up the police for their investigation. Additional sessions judge Amitabh Rawat said instead of investigating the complaint, the police's entire focus was upon the complainant and the accused.
He also called the police's arguments in court 'ludicrous' and 'proposterous'.
He directed the DCP of northeast Delhi to register an FIR within seven days of recieving the order.
On 30 August, the FIR was registered.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)